GERMADAN RAWA PENING: TINDAKAN BERSAMA DALAM PENGELOLAAN COMMON POOL RESOURCES (Germadan Rawa Pening: Collective action in managing common pool resources)

S. Agung Sri Raharjo, Faiqotul Falah, S. Andy Cahyono

Abstract


ABSTRACT

Germadan is one form of lake management policy implemented through the establishment of institutions involving many stakeholders. The institutional management of the Rawa Pening Lake is a collective action to the preservation of the Rawa Pening Lake. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of Germadan in the perspective of the theory of collective action. The research used a qualitative approach. Data collection through in-depth interviews, observation, and literature study. The descriptive analysis was carried out to describe the implementation and to identify the successes and failures of Germadan. Based the analysis, it can be concluded that as a collective action, Germadan has failed. This failure is due to imperfection of participation in planning and implementation of the program, and the lack of enforcement of agreed rules and lack of incentives for both economic and social incentives in their implementation.

Keywords: Germadan; Rawa Pening; collective action; stakeholders

 

ABSTRAK

Germadan merupakan salah satu bentuk kebijakan pengelolaan danau yang dilaksanakan melalui pembentukan kelembagaan yang melibatkan banyak pemangku kepentingan. Kelembagaan pengelolaan Danau Rawa Pening merupakan tindakan bersama untuk kelestarian Danau Rawa Pening. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi pelaksanaan Germadan dalam perspektif teori collective action. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan studi pustaka. Analisis secara deskriptif dilakukan untuk menggambarkan pelaksanaan Germadan dan mengetahui keberhasilan maupun kegagalan collective action dalam Germadan. Berdasarkan analisis dapat disimpulkan bahwa sebagai sebuah tindakan bersama, Germadan telah gagal. Kegagalan ini disebabkan oleh partisipasi dalam penyusunan perencanaan dan pelaksanaan program tidak sempurna, dan tidak adanya upaya penegakan aturan yang telah disepakati serta kurangnya insentif baik insentif ekonomi maupun sosial dalam pelaksanaannya.

Kata kunci: Germadan; Rawa Pening; collective action; pemangku kepentingan


Keywords


Germadan; Rawa Pening; collective action; stakeholders

References


Abimanyu, K. (2016). Analisis pemanfaatan sumber daya alam Danau Rawa Pening Kabupaten Semarang. Skripsi Program Studi Pendidikan Geografi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Barnaud, C., Corbera, E., Muradian, R., Salliou, N., Sirami, C., Vialatte, A., & Choisis, J. (2018). Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action : A conceptual framework. Ecology and Society, 23(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5751/ ES-09848-230115

Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (1999). Collective action as a social exchange. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39, 341–369.

Hidayati, N., Soeprobowati, T. R., & Hemi, M. (2018). The evaluation of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassiper ) control program in Rawa Pening Lake, Central Java Indonesia: The evaluation of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassiper) control program in Rawa Pening Lake, Central Java Indonesia. Earth and Environmental Science, 142(012016), 1–5.

Indrayati, A., & Hikmah, N. I. (2018). Prediksi sedimen Danau Rawa Pening tahun 2020 sebagai dasar reservasi Sungai Tuntang berbasis sistem informasi geografis. In Restorasi Sungai : Tantangan dan solusi pembangunan berkelanjutan (pp. 543–552). Surakarta.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. (2011). Profil 15 danau prioritas nasional. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup.

Kusumastuti, A. (2015). Modal sosial dan mekanisme adaptasi masyarakat pedesaan dalam pengelolaan dan pembangunan infrastruktur modal sosial dan mekanisme adaptasi masyarakat pedesaan dalam. MASYARAKAT : Jurnal Sosiologi, 20(1), 81–97.

Lane, J. (2013). Global environmental coordination : How to overcome the double collective action problematic ?, Sociology Mind, 03(01), 83–88.

Negi, S., Pham, T. T., Karky, B., & Garcia, C. (2018). Role of community and user attributes in collective action : Case study of community-based forest management in Nepal. Forest, 9(136), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.3390/f9030136

Nursidah, Nugroho, B., Darusman, D., Rusdiana, O., & Rasyid, Y. (2012). Pengembangan institusi untuk membangun aksi kolektif lokal dalam pengelolaan hutan kawasan lindung SWP DAS Arau, Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, XVIII(1), 18–30. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307706192_Institutional_Development_to_Build_a_Succesfull_Local_Collective_Action_in_Forest_Management_from_Arau_Watershed_Unit

Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Tengah. (2018). Ringkasan executive rencana pengelolaan Danau Rawa Pening. Semarang.

Rovita, G. D., Purnomo, P. W., & Soedarsono, P. (2012). Stratifikasi vertikal NO3-N dan PO4-P pada perairan di sekitar Enceng Gondok (Eichornia crassipes Solms) dengan latar belakang penggunaan lahan yang berbeda di Rawa Pening, Management of Aquatic Resources Journal, 1(1), 1–7.

Sapkota, L. M., Shrestha, R. P., Jourdain, D., & Shivakoti, G. P. (2015). Factors affecting collective action for forest fire management : A comparative study of community forest user groups in Central Siwalik, Nepal. Environmental Management, 55, 171–186. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0404-x

Satia, R., Isnadi, Y., & Retnandari, N. D. (2016). Common pool resources of Lake Takapan. Journal of Environmental Science, 5.

Schroeder, N. M., & Castillo, A. (2013). Collective action in the management of a tropical dry forest ecosystem : Effects of Mexico’s property rights regime. Environmental Management, 51, 850–861. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9980-9

Soeprobowati, T. R., & Suedy, S. W. A. (2010). Status trofik Danau Rawa Pening dan solusi pengelolaannya. Jurnal Sains Dan Matematika, 18(4), 158–169.

Suharti, S., Darusman, D., Nugroho, B., & Sundawati, L. (2016). Strengthening social capital for propelling collective action in mangrove management. Wetlands Ecol Manage, 24, 683–695. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-016-9496-9

Theesfeld, I. (2011). Perceived power resources in situations of collective action. Water Alternatives, 4(1), 86–103.

Tim Penyusunan Germadan Rawa Pening. (2011). Gerakan Penyelamatan Danau (Germadan) Danau Rawa Pening.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jppdas.2019.3.1.1-12

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 

 

Published by:

Cooperation the Center for Implementation of Standards for Environmental and Forestry Instruments Solo (BPSILHK Solo) with the Indonesian Soil and Water Conservation Society (MKTI)

eISSN : 2579-5511,  pISSN : 2579-6097

 

Secretary:

The Center for Implementation of Standards for Environmental and Forestry Instruments Solo (BPSILHK Solo)
Jl. Jend A. Yani-Pabelan, Kartasura Po.BOX 295 Surakarta 57102
Phone.(0271) 716709 ; Fax(0271) 716959;
Email : sekred.jppdas@gmail.com

Website : http://dassolo.litbang.menlhk.go.id/

Copyright : Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai (Journal of Watershed Management Research)