KARAKTERISTIK MASYARAKAT TANI TAWANGSARI - JAWA TENGAH PADA KEBERHASILAN ADOPSI TEKNOLOGI KONSERVASI
Sari
Keberhasilan pelaksanaan kegiatan konservasi sangat tergantung pada karakteristik dari suatu masyarakat. Penelitian ini ditujukkan untuk menjelaskan karakteristik kelompok masyarakat yang melaksanakan kegiatan konservasi dan berhasil menambah pendapatan anggotanya. Penelitian dilakukan melalui pendekatan kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan menggunakan metode wawancara mendalam dan Focus Group Discussion (FGD) terhadap anggota kelompok LMDH (Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan) Wana Lestari di Desa Tawangsari, Kabupaten Purworejo, Provinsi Jawa Tengah serta observasi untuk mendapatkan data mengenai gambaran teknik konservasi yang diterapkan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keberhasilan pelaksanaan kegiatan konservasi tanah di wilayah kajian sangat dipengaruhi oleh sifat masyarakatnya yang homogen, memiliki kesadaran bersama, bersifat adopter, mengembangkan budaya kolektif dan memiliki persepsi positif pada konservasi. Keberhasilan kegiatan konservasi sangat tergantung pada peran para pemimpin desa yang mampu bertindak sebagai menjadi agen perubahan, pengambil resiko, inovator, koordinator dapat berinisiatif dan mampu memobilisasi warganya serta didukung oleh keberadaan lembaga konservasi yang tumbuh karena keinginan anggotanya bisa bekerja secara efisien dan efektif, adil dan tidak memihak, mampu membuat aturan main bagi anggotanya dan dibangun secara partisipatif. Alasan masyarakat tani hutan melakukan konservasi adalah adanya keuntungan ekonomi dari kegiatan ini, hak penguasaan lahan dan peluang pasar atas hasil tanaman konservasinya
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
pdf Bahasa IndonesiaReferensi
Agrawal, A dan Gibson, C.C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27, 629-649.
Amsalu, A dan de Graff, J. (2007). Determinant of adoption and continued use of stone terraces for soil and water conservation in an Ethiopian highland watershed. Ecologycal Economics. 61, 294-302.
BPS. (2010). Kecamatan Kaligesing dalam angka. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Purworejo.
Buyu, G.E.O. (2002). Factors affecting participation in technology development and transfer: case of farmer field schools on water harvesting and soil conservation in Mbeere Kenya. A Research Report Submitted to the Farm-Level Applied Methods of Research for East and Southern Africa in fulfillment of the requirement of the KEN 99- Student Grant funds. Nairobi, Kenya.
Bodo, P. (2004). Open and close organizations. Paper presented at seminar International Human Resource Management. Diakses: Desember 2010. (http://www.hr-network.hu/szolgaltatasok/open_and_closed_organizations.pdf).
de Aranzabal, I., F. Scmitz, M. Aguilera, P. & Pineda F.D. (2008). Modelling of landscape changes derived from the dynamics of socio-ecologycal systems, a case of study in a semiarid Mediteranian landscape. Ecologycal Indicators. 8, 672-685.
Doss, C. R. (2006). Analyzing technology adoption using microstudies: limitations, challenges, and opportunities for improvement. Agricultural Economics. 34, 207-219.
Franzel, S., Denning G.L., Lilleso J.P.B. & Mercado, Jr. A.R. (2004). Scalling up the impact of agroforestry : lessons from three sites in Africa and Asia. Agroforestry Systems. 61, 329-344.
Gebremedhin, B., & Swinton, S.M. (2003). Investment in soil conservation in Northern Ethiopia : the role of land tenure security and public programs. Agricultural Economics. 29, 69-84.
Giller, K.E., Witter, E., Coorbeels, M., & Tittonell, P. (2009). Conservation agriculture and smallholders in Africa : The heretics’ view. Field Crop Research. 114, 23-34.
Hancock, J. (1997). Extension education: conducting effective agricultural demonstrations. Cooperative Extension Service. University of Kentucky. College of Agriculture. USA.
Haryanti, N. (2010). Aspek sosiologis adopsi teknologi rehabilitasi lahan dan konservasi tanah. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan dan Konservasi Alam. 7 (5), 525-536.
Herbel, D., Crowley, E, Haddad, N.O., & Lee, M. (2012). Good practices in building innovative rural institution to increase food security. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Knox, A & Meinzen-Dick, R. (1999). Property right, collective action, and technologies for natural resource management. CGIAR. System Wide Program on Collective Action and Property Right. Policy Brief. No. 1 October 1999.
Lapar, A.L. & Pandey, S. (1999). Adoption of soil conservation: the case of the Philippine uplands. Agricultural Economic. 21, 241-256.
Manolis, J. C. (2008). Leadership: a new frontier in conservation science. Conservation Biology. 23 (4), 879-886.
Marquardt, M.J. (2000). Action learning and leadership. The Learning Organization. 7 (5), 233-240.
McDonald, M. & Brown,K. (2000). Soil and water conservation projects and rural livelihood : option for design and research to enhance adoption and adaptation . Land Degradation Development. 11, 343-361.
Omari, R. (2008). Agricultural technology adoption and related policy issues in Ghana”. Paper presented at the conference on Practicing Agricultural Innovation in Africa - A Platform for Action, 12th-14th May 2008 at Movenpick Hotel Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Roger, E. (1983). Diffussion of innovation. New York : The Free Press.
Scherr, J. S. (2000). A downward spiral? Research evidence on the relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation. Food Policy. 25, 479-498.
Taylor, A. (2010). Using the lever of leadership to drive environmental change: ten tips for practitioners. Proceeding of the Enviro 2010 Conference. 21-23 July 2010, Melbourne, Australia.
Trotman, R. (2008). The benefits of community conservation : a literature review. Auckland Regional Council.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9868/ifrj.2.2.145-163
##submission.copyrightStatement##
Copyright of Jurnal Penelitian Hutan dan Keonservasi Alam (ISSN:2338-9249)
