Email this article IMPACTS, PATTERNS, INFLUENCING FACTORS AND POLICIES OF FUELWOOD EXTRACTION IN WAY KAMBAS NATIONAL PARK, INDONESIA
DOI: 10.20886/ijfr.2016.3.1.33-47Abstract
Uncontrolled fuelwood extraction from conservation forest of Way Kambas National Park (WKNP) could threaten the existing forest. This paper studies the way to tackle the forest degradation in WKNP, with less negative impacts to the local people. Study was conducted by analysing existing data and maps of WKNP in terms of forest degradation, forest inventories, current policies, survey on how fuelwood is extracted, observation on fuelwood gatherers, fuelwood demand, and identification of further policy options. Results show that the most significant factors influencing the fuelwood extraction activity in WKNP are land ownership, followed by the distance to forest area, income level, the number of household members and age of household head. In the field, the fuelwood utilization is allowed by WKNP Authority, although it is formally forbidden.It was stated that fuelwood extraction in the area should be less than 2.89 ton/ha/year to maintain its sustainability, based on the mean WNKP forest tree annual increment. The fact shows that fuelwood extraction in WKNP reduces of forest biomass stock (1.06 tons/ha/year) and decreases species diversity index (from 3.05 to 2.45), species evenness index (from 1.06 to 0.91) and old-young tree ratio (from 1.29 to 1). Ecosystem quality reduction is mainly caused by destructive techniques in extracting fuelwood such as slashing, scratching cambium, and cutting trees. Therefore, recommended policy includes legalizing fuelwood extraction with restrictions, providing alternative fuelwood and other biomass energy resources outside WKNP, conducting preventive (establishing checkpoints and increasing patrols) and pre-emptive (educating and campaigning) efforts, collaborating with other stakeholders, and empowering local economy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arnold, M., Köhlin, G., Persson, R., & Shepherd, G. (2003). Fuelwood revisited: what has changed in the last decade?. Occasional Paper No. 39. Bogor : Center for International Forestry Research.
Black, K. (2008). Business statistics for contemporarydecision making. (5th Edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Broadhead, J., Bahdon, J., & Whiteman, A. (2001). Wood-fuel consumption modelling and results. (Annex 2) in Past Trends and Future Prospects for the Utilization of Wood for Energy (No. GFPOS/WP/05). Rome.
Brown, G., Tolsma, A., Murphy, S., Miehs, A., McNabb, E., & York, A. (2010). Ecological impacts of firewood collection - A literature review to inform firewood management on public land in Victoria. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment.
Brown, S., Gillespie, A. J. R., & Lugo, A. E. (1989). Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science, 35, 881–902.
Chanal, M. (2012). How is 100 % renewable energy possible in South Korea by 2020? (pp. 1–33). Global Energy Network Institute.
Cresswell, J. (1994). Research design qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage. (pp. 3–26). doi:10.3109/08941 939.2012.723954
Department of Forestry. (2005). Fuelwood consumption 2002 – 2004. Jakarta: Centre for Forestry Planning and Statistics, Forestry Planning Agency.
Forestry Act No 41 (1999). Republic of Indonesia.
Goverment Regulation No 28: Management of Nature Reserve Areas and Nature Conservation Areas (2011). Republic of Indonesia.
Johannesen, A. B. (2006). Designing Integrated Conservation and Development Projects (ICDPs): Illegal hunting, Wildlife Conservation, and the Welfare of the Local People. Environment and Development Economics, 11, 247–267.
Lampung Timur’s Bureau of Statistics. (2010). Labuhan Ratu in numbers 2009/2010. Sukadana: Lampung Timur’s Bureau of Statistics. Ludwig, J. A., & Reynolds, J. F. (1988). Statistical ecology : A premier of methods and computing. New York: Wiley Press.
Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mathews, E. (2009). Undying flame: the continuing demand for wood as fuel. World Resource Institute. Retrieved from http://earthtrends. wri.org/text/ energyresources/feature-3.html [01/11/2011]
Mehta, V. K., Sullivan, P. J., Walter, M. ., Krishnaswamy, J., & DeGloria, S. D. (2008). Ecosystem impacts of disturbance in a dry tropical forest in Southern India. Ecohydrol, 1, 149–160.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2002). World energy outlook.
Sankaran, M., & McNaughton, S. J. (2005). Terrestrial Plant-herbivore interactions: Integrating across multiple determinants and trophic levels. In M. E (Ed.), Vegetation ecology (pp. 265–285). Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing.
Simon, H. (1999). Pengelolaan hutan bersama masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Skutsch, M., & Ghilardi, A. (2008). Energy Access In REDD: Prospects for socially responsible woodfuel 46 interventions. Centro de Investigacionesen Geografía Ambiental. Morelia, Mexico: UNAM.
Verhoest, C., & Ryckmans, Y. (2012). Industrial wood pellets report. Laborelec, PellCert, and Intelegent Energy Europe.
Verplanke, J. J., & Zahabu, E. (2009). A field guide for assessing and monitoring reduced forest degradation and carbon sequestration by local communities. Project team KYOTO: Think Global, Act Local (K: TGAL), Department of Technology and Sustainable Development, University of Twente.
Verschuren, P., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Designing a research project. 2nd Ed. Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
WKNP Authority. (2011). Management plan of forest rehabilitation in WKNP 2012-2016. Labuhan Ratu: WKNP Authority.
Yamane, T. (1967). Elementary sampling theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc..
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
