Email this article STAKEHOLDERS' MAPPING AND STRATEGY FOR RESTORING PEATLAND FOREST IN WEST TANJUNG JABUNG JAMBI, INDONESIA
DOI: 10.20886/ijfr.2021.8.1.37-57Abstract
Peatland forests became the centre of discussions in Indonesia because 33% of 2.4 million hectares burned in 2014. This research aims to describe the stakeholders' position and their logic in choosing a strategy for peatland forest areas. The result shows that nine stakeholders were actively involved in peatland forest restoration in West Tanjung Jabung Regency. Based on categorization, the analysis points out that all stakeholders had occupied key players' position. Further analysis using a ladder of participation criteria found two models of participation, i.e. citizen power and tokenism. However, the value of citizen power is higher than tokenism that is 56% and 44%, respectively. It means that stakeholders should develop partnership and other models in citizen power criteria to reach their targets. It also means that trust is an essential variable in the relationship among stakeholders and should be developed in peatland forest restoration. The consequence of this research is that stakeholders can improve two strategies, i.e. collaborative forest management and community-based forest management.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Axelsson R., Angelstam P., Elbakidze M., & Stryamets N.E.J.K (2011). Sustainable development and sustainability: Landscape approach as a practical interpretation of principles and implementation concepts. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 4, 5–30.
Azhari K.I. (2011). Tingkat partisipasi masyarakat pada tahap perencanaan dalam program neighbourhood development: Studi kasus Desa Jendi Kecamatan Selogiri Kabupaten Wonogiri. Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
Badan Restorasi Gambut. (2016). Rencana strategis Badan Restorasi Gambut 2016–2020. Badan Restorasi Gambut Republik Indonesia.
Birner R., & Wittmer H. (2000). Converting social capital into political capital: How do lcal communities gain political influence? A theoretical approach and empirical evidence from Thailand and Columbia. Paper submitted to the 8th Biennial Conference of the International Association for Goettingen.
Brown J.D. (2011). Likert items and scales of measurement? SHIKEN: JALT testing & evaluation. SIG Newsleter, 15(1), 10–14.
Budiaji, W. (2013). Skala pengukuran dan jumlah respon skala likert. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian dan Perikanan, 2(2), 127–133. Retrieved from http://umbidharma.org/jipp on the 1st December 2020.
Collins K., & Ison, R. (2006). Dare we jump off Arnstein's ledder Social learning as a new policy paradigm. In Proceedings of PATH (Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology) Conference. Edinburgh.
Desmiwati, & Christian F.Y. (2019). Levelling up the collaborative forest management in Indonesia: A review. IOP Publishing.
Edwars S.A., & Heiduk F. (2015). Hazy days: Forest fires and politics of environmental security in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 34, 65–94.
Fauziyah, E., & Sanudin, S. (2017). Efektifitas kelembagaan dan kebijakan hutan rakyat di Kabupaten Banjarnegara dan Banyumas. Jurnal Wasian, 4(2), 79–88.
Fibriani D. (2012). Evaluasi proses implementasi kebijakan hutan rakyat di Kabupaten Sarolangun, Jambi. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana, IPB, Bogor.
Gilens M., & Page, B.I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. American Political Science Association, 12, 564–581. doi: //10.1017/S1537592714001595.
Haapalehto T., Vasander H., Jauhiainen S., Tahvanainen T., & Kotiaho, J.S. (2010). The effect of peatland restoration on water table depth, elemental concentration and vegetation: 10 Years of Change. Restoration Ecology, 19(5), 587–598.
Hackett S.C. (2001). Environmental and natural resources economics: Theory, policy and the sustainable society (Second Ed.). New York: M.E.Sharpe.
Handoyo. (2015). Resolusi konflik TN Tesso Nilo: Tinjauan relasi pemangku kepentingan dengan power stakeholder analysis. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 12(2), 89–103. doi://10.20886/jakk.2015.12..89-104.
Harding L., & Macdonald C. (2001). Developing new approaches for stakeholder engagement in the minerals sector, mining, minerals and sustainable development project, IIEED. London.
Hick A,J., & Misra. (1993). Political resources and the growth of welfare in affluent capitalist democrasies, 1960-1982. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 668–710.
Lunenburg, F.C. (2012). Power and leadership: An influence process. Intenational Journal of Management, Business and Administration, 15, 1–8.
Mathur V.N., Price A.D.F., & Austin, S.A. (2008). Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 601–609.
Miettinen J., & Soo, C.L. (2010). Status of peatland degradation and development in Sumatera and Kalimantan. AMBIO A Journal of the Human Environment, 39, 394–401. doi://10.1007/s13280-010-0051-2.
Murniati, & Suharti S. (2018). Toward zero burning peatland preparation: Incentives schemes and stakeholders roles. Biodiversitas, 19, 1396–1405.
Muttaqin M.Z., Alviya I., Lugina, M., Almuhayat F., Hamdani U., & Indartik. (2019). Developing community-based forest ecocsystem service management to reduce emission from deforestation and forest degradation. Forest Policy and Economics, 108, 1–9.
Nugroho I.A. (2016). Pemetaan para pihak dalam pemanfaatan tumbuhan obat sebagai bahan baku jamu: Studi kasus di Pulau Jawa. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana IPB. Bogor.
Nurrochmat D.R. (2017). Strategi kebijakan pembangunan kehutanan dan lingkungan berkelanjutan (Orasi). Bogor: IPB.
Nurrochmat D.R., Nugroho I.A., Hardjanto, Purwadianto A., Maryudi A., & Erbaugh, J.T. (2017). Shifting contestation into cooperation: Strategy to incorporate different interest of actors in medicinal plants in Meru Betiri National Park, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 83, 162–68.
Nurrochmat D.R., Darusman D.R., & Ekayani M. (2016). Kebijakan pembangunan kehutanan dan lingkungan: Teori dan implementasi. Bogor.: IPB Press.
Nurrochmat, D.R., Nugroho, I.A., Hardjanto, Purwadianto, A., Maryudi, A., & Erbaugh, J.T. (2017). Shifting contestation into cooperation: Strategy to incorporate different interest of actors in medicinal plants in Meru Betiri National Park, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 83, 162-168. doi://10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.005.
Okereke, C.D.I. (2019). Palm oil, power and participation: The political ecology of social impact assessment. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1–21. Retrieved from http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/86366/ on the 1st December 2020.
Oktavia S., & Saharuddin. (2013). The relationship between role of the stakeholder and community participation in agropolitan program in Karacak Village, Leuwiliang Subdistrict, Bogor District. Solidity: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 1(3), 231–246.
Ramdhani M.R., Ruhimat, A., Wiyono, & Barnes, A. (2020). Imaging tropical peatland and auifer potential in South Sumatera using electrical resistivity tomography. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 7(1), 1–14.
Reed M.S., Grave A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Huback K., Morris J., ... Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resources management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1933–1949.
Reed M.S., Vella S., Challies E., de Vente J., Frewer L,.,Hohenwallner Ries D., ... van Delden, H. (2017). A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology, 26(S1),1-18. doi://10.1111/rec.12541.
Rehman S.A.U., Sabiham S., Sudadi U., & Anwar, S. (2015). Impacts of oil palm plantations on climate change: A review of peat swamp forests' conversion in Indonesia. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, 4, 1–7.
Ribot J.S., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). Theory of access. The Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153–181.
Santika T., Meijaard E., Budiharta S., Law E.A., Kusworo A., Hutabarat J.A., ... Stigner, M. (2017). Community forest management in Indonesia: Avoided deforestation in the context of anthropogenic and climate complexities. Global Environment Change, 46, 60–71.
Saputra, E. (2019). Beyond fires and deforestation: Tackling land subsidence in peat land areas, A case study from Riau, Indonesia. Land, 8, 1–24.
Siisiainen M. (2000). Two concepts of social capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam. Finland.Sylviani, Suka, A.P., Surati, & Kurniasari, D. P (2020). Social capital in managing community plantation forest: A case study at KPH Boalemo, Gorontalo Province. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 7(1), 71–82. doi://10.20886/ijfr.2020.7.1.71-82.
Tata H.L., & Susmianto, A. (2016). Prospek paludikultur ekosistem gambut Indonesia. Bogor: Forda Press.
Tata, H.L., & Tampubolon, A. (2016). Participatory approach in the peat swamp forest management of two different forest statuses in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. In 15th International Peat Congress 2016: Peatlands in Harmony Agriculture, Industry and Nature (pp. 582 – 586). Kuching-Serawak, Malaysia.
Tata, H. L. (2019). Mix farming systems on peat land in Jambi and Central Kalimantan Provinces, Indonesia: Should they be described as paludiculture? Mires and Peat, 25, 1–17. doi://10.19189/MaP.2018.KHR.360.
Uda S. K., Hein L., & Sumarga, E. (2017). Toward sustainable management of Indonesia tropical peat lands. Wetlands Ecology Management, 25, 683–701.
Watts J. D., Tacconi L., Hapsari N., Irawan S., Sloan S, & Widiastono, T. (2019). Incentivizing compliance: Evaluating the effectiveness of targeted village incentives for reducing burning in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 108, 1–15.
Winkel, G. (2012). Foucaults in the forests-A review of the use of "Foucauldian" concepts in the forest analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 81–92.
World Bank. (2016). The world bank annual report 2016. Washington DC. doi: //10.1596/978-1-4648-852-4.
Yulianto, S. R., Hikmat A., & Kusmana, C. (2019). Crafting local institution using socialecological system framework for sustainable rattan governance in Lore Lindu National Park. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 25, 135–145.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
