Nurtjahjawilasa Nurtjahjawilasa, Hariadi Kartodihardjo, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Agus Justianto


Management and development of forestry human resources is very important on attaining the objectives of forestry development towards sustainable forest management (SFM) and prosperous society. Lack of proper policy on forestry human resources management and development may degrade the quality of forest governance. Good understanding of the dynamics of power, interests, knowledge, and networks of stakeholders affecting the structure and performance of forestry human resources and it can be done by using an institutional approach to stakeholder analysis framework. This study aimed to determine the parties' interests and influences in policy-making on forestry human resource management and development. The study was conducted using snowball sampling method both in internal and external of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. It is found that sixteen stakeholders involved in the policy-making on forestry management and human resources development, which can be divided into the groups of: subjects, key players, context setters, and crowds. The existing relationships are cooperation, complementary and conflict. It needs good understanding, clear rules and strong leadership in order to increase the optimal role of stakeholders and to determine human resource management policies and development.


Human resources; development; forestry, stakeholders

Full Text:



Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2014). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Republik Indonesia (RPJMNRI) 2015–2019 pemerintah. Jakarta: Bappenas.

Brown, S., Lamming, R., Bessant, J. and Jones, P. (2000). Strategic OperationsManagement. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Danish, Rizwan Qaiser and Ali Usman. 2010. Impact of Reward and Recognition on Job Satisfaction and Motivation: An Empirical Study from Pakistan. International Journal of Business and management Vol 5 No 2: 159-167

Departemen Kehutanan. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor: P.76Menhut-II2006 tentang Pola Karier Pegawai Negeri Sipil Departemen Kehutanan. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal.

Erdheim, J., Wang, M. & ickar, M.J. (2006). Linking the big five personality constructs to organizational commitment. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences 41: 959-970. doi:10.1016/ j.paid.2006.04.005.

Fletcher S. (2003). Competence-Based Assessment Techniques. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Friedman AL, Miles S. 2006. Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Hermans LM dan Thiessen WAH. 2009. Actor Analysis Methods and Their Use for Public Policy Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 196:808-818.

Khan, M., Tariq, N., Khan, A., Mahmood, K. (2012). An organizational concept of human resource development – How human resource management scholars view 'HRD' (Literature Review). niversal Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 2(5), 36-47.

Liu, W., Lepak, D.P., Takeuchi, R., Sims Jr, H.P. (2003). Matching leadership styles with employment modes: Strategic human resource management perspective. Journal of Human Resource Management Review, 13, 127–152. doi: 10.1016/S10534822(02)00102-.

Nurtjahjawilasa. (2013) Kelembagaan dan Kebijakan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia (SDM) Kehutanan (Studi Kasus di Bidang Perizinan Kehutanan) (Proposal Desertasi Pascasarjana). Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Palanski, Michael E. and Francis J. Yammarino. 2007. Integrity and Leadership: Clearing the Conceptual Confusion. European Management Journal Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 171–184. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2007.04.006

Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Nomor: P.18/MENLHK-II/2015 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.

Reed, M.S, Anil Graves, Norman Dandy, Helena Posthumus, Klaus Hubacek, Joe Morris, Christina Prell, Claire H. Quinn, Lindsay C. Stringer. 2009. Who’s In And Why? A Typology Of Stakeholder Analysis Methods For Natural Resource Management. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1933–1949

Rose, et al. 2008. Organizational Culture as a Root of Performance Improvement: Research and Recommendations. Contemporary Management Research Vol. 4, No. 1:43-56. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Putra Malaysia

Roslinda, Emi, Dudung Darusman, Didik Suharjito, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat. 2012. Analisis Pemangku Kepentingan dalam Pengelolaan Taman Nasional Danau Sentarum Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu, Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika Volume XVIII: 78-85. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.18.2.78

Strang, S. E. and Kuhnert, K.W. 2009.Personality and Leadership Developmental Levels as predictors of leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.009

Swanson and Arnold. 1996. The Purpose of Human Resources Development is to Improve Organizational Performance. University of Minnesota, St. Paul: Jossey-Bass Publishers

Vagar et al. 2011. Effectiveness of HRD for Developing SMEs in South Asia. MPRA Paper No. 30780, posted 8. May 2011 13:41 UTC. Online at

Werner, Jon M. Werner and Randy L. DeSimone. 2012. Human Resources Development, Six Edition. USA: South-Western, Cengage Learning

Yulk, G.A. (2005). Kepemimpinan dalam organisasi. (Terjemahan, Edisi ke-5). Jakarta (ID): Penerbit Indeks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan