LEGAL CERTAINTY AND LEGITIMACY OF STATE FOREST GAZETTMENT IN RIAU PROVINCE, INDONESIA

Pernando Sinabutar, Bramasto Nugroho, Hariadi Kartodihardjo, Dudung Darusman

Abstract


Legal certainty and legitimacy of forest area can be gained through the gazettment process of forest area that starts from the designation, boundary demarcation, mapping, and ends up with the establishment. In Riau Province, these processes are stagnant, and, therefore, the legal certainty and legitimacy is difficult to achieve. What is really happenned is something that needs to be answered in this study. By using the analysis of strategy typology and descriptive qualitative analysis, this study has found that the gazettment issues of forest area consisted of three aspects, namely: designation, boundary demarcation and establishment. Social conflict has been accumulated along the gazettment process, so that the legal certainty did not lead to legitimacy. This problem happened due to: claims avoidance (PTB) to avoid failure in boundaries determination; policy narrative of the boundaries are not informed to community; inconsistency between the objective of boundary demarcation with the implementation; domination of all informed knowledge and information (BPKH); stages of gazettment were done just to fulfill administrative procedure; BPKH tasks issues; and state forest area regarded as the common pool resources (CPRs). This result proves that the improvement of government, policy in gazettment of forest area is seriously required.


Keywords


Forest gazettment process; legal certainty; legitimacy; policy failure.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alden, W.L., Mbaya, S. (2001). Land, people and forests in Eastern & Southern Africa at the beginning st of the 21 Century: The impact of land relations of the role of communities in forest future. Switzerland: IUCN-EARO.

Afiff, S. (2005). Tinjauan atas konsep ”tenure security” dengan beberapa rujukan pada kasuskasus di Indonesia. J. Ilmu Sosial Transformatif, 20(1), 227-249.

Amin, M. (2013). Kekuasaan dan politik lokal (Studi tentang peran Pemuda Pancasila dalam mendukung Syamsul Arifin dan Gatot Pudjonugroho sebagai calon gubernur dan wakil gubernur Provinsi Sumatera Utara periode 2008-2013). Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Antoro, S.K. (2010). Konflik-konflik sumberdaya alam di kawasan pertambangan pasir besi: studi implikasi otonomi daerah (Studi kasus di Kabupaten Kulon Progo Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Ansoms, A.N., Wagemakers, I., Walker, M.M., & Murison, J. (2014). Land contestation at the micro scale: struggles for spacein the African Marshes. J. World Development, 54(1), 243- 252.doi :10.1016/j.worlddev .2013.08.010.

Bromley, D.W. (1992). The commons, property, and common property regimes. In Bromley, D.W. & Feeny, D. (Eds.), Making the Commons Work. San Francisco: ICS Press. Bryant, R.L. & Bailey, S. (2001). Third world political ecology. London: Routledge.

Campbell. (2003). Beragam pandangan mengenai kehutanan masyarakat (community forestry di Indonesia). In Resosudarmo, I.A.P. & Colfer, C.L.P. (eds.), Ke mana Harus Melangkah? Masyarakat, Hutan dan Perumusan Kebijakan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Contreras-Hermosilla, A. & Fay, C. (2006). Memperkokoh pengelolaan hutan Indonesia: melalui pembaruan penguasaan tanah, permasalahan dan kerangka tindakan. Bogor: Bogor World Agroforestry Center dan Forest Trends.

Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research design qualitative & quantitative approaches. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Denzin, N.K. (1989). Intervretive biography: qualitatif research method. (Series 17). London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Deininger, K. (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. (World Bank Policy). University of California.

Dev Roy, A.K., Alam, K., & Gow, J. (2011). A review of the role of property rights and forest policies in the management of the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest in Bangladesh. J. Forest Policy and Economics, 15(3), 46-53. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011 .08.009. de Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital. New York: Basic Books.

Dove, M.R. (1985). Government perceptions of traditional social forestry in Indonesia: The history, causes, and implications of state policy on Swidden Agricultural. In Rao, Y.S., Vergara, N.T., & Lovecale, G.W. (Eds.), Community Forestry: Socio-Economic Aspects. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization.

Firmansyah. (2004). Studi konflik lahan perkebunan kopi rakyat dalam kawasan hutan lindung di Kabupaten Rejang Lebong Provinsi Bengkulu. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Fuad & Maskanah. (2000). Inovasi penyelesaian sengketa pengelolaan sumberdaya hutan. Bogor: Pustaka Latin.

Hakim, I. & Wibowo, L.R. (2013). Reforma agraria: terputusnya sejarah dan “untouchable” sektor? In Hakim, I. & Wibowo, L.R. (Eds.), Jalan Terjal Reforma Agraria di Sektor Kehutanan. Bogor: Pusat Perubahan Iklim dan Kebijakan.

Irawan, P. (2007). Penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif untuk ilmu-ilmu sosial. Jakarta: UI Press.

Kartodihardjo, H. (2013). Masalah cara pikir dan praktek kehutanan: refleksi dan evaluasi. In Kartodihardjo, H. (Ed.), Kembali ke jalan lurus: Kritik penggunaan llmu dan praktek kehutanan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Nailil Printika.

Kitamura, K. & Clapp, R.A. (2013). Common property protected areas: community control in forest conservation. J. Land Use Policy, 34(2), 204-212. doi : 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013 .03.008.

Lahandu. (2007). Analisis kebijakan pengelolaan akses sumberdaya alam oleh masyarakat Kaili di Taman Hutan Raya (Tahura) Sulawesi Tengah. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Marbun, B.N. (2009). Kamus hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Maring, P. (2010). Bagaimana kekuasaan bekerja di balik konflik, perlawanan dan kolaborasi? Sebuah sudut pandang antropologi tentang perebutan sumberdaya ekologi. Jakarta: Lembaga Pengkajian Antropologi Kekuasaan Indonesia.

Nugraha, A. (2013). Mengakhiri rezim konflik kehutanan: Momentum pasca keputusan MK. In Darurat hutan Indonesia: Mewujudkan arsitektur kehutanan Indonesia. Banten: Wana Aksara.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 44 Tahun 2004 tentang Perencanaan Kehutanan.

Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No. P. 47/MenhutII/2010 tentang Pembentukan Panitia Tata Batas.

Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No. P. 37/MenhutII/2013 tentang Pedoman Pemantauan dan Pengukuran Kinerja Kementerian Kehutanan tahun 2013.

Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No. P. 44/MenhutII/2012 jo. P.62/Menhut-II/2013 tentang Pengukuhan Kawasan Hutan.

Prayogo, D. (2010). Anatomi konflik antara korporasi dan komunitas lokal pada industri geotermal di Jawa Barat. Jurnal Makara, Sosial Hu-maniora, 14(1), 25-34.

Rahmawati, R. (2013). Konflik-konflik sumberdaya hutan di Jawa Barat dan Kalimantan Barat Indonesia. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Ridwan. (2014). Diskresi dan tanggung jawab pemerintah. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.

Safitri, M.A.(2011). Menuju kepastian dan keadilan tenurial. Pandangan kelompok masyarakat sipil Indonesia: prinsip, prasyarat dan langkah mereformasi kebijakan penguasaan tanah dan kawasan hutan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Fasilitator Kelompok Masyarakat Sipil Untuk Reformasi Tenurial.

Sirait, M., Situmorang, L., Galudra, G., Fay, C., & Pasya, G. (2004). Kebijakan pengukuhan kawasan hutan dan realisasinya. Bogor: World Agroforestry Centre.

Sivalai, V., Khantachavana, Turvey, C.G., Kong, R., & Xia, X. (2012). On the transaction values of land use rights in rural China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(2), 863-878. doi : 10.1016/j.jce.2012.11.003.

Sugiyono. (2010). Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan.

Verbist, B. & Pasya, G. (2004). Perspektif sejarah status kawasan hutan, konflik dan negosiasi di Sumberjaya Lampung Barat Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Agrivita, 26(1), 20-28.

Wibowo, L.R., Race, D., & Curtis, A. (2012). Exploring the policy dimensions for community based forest management in Indonesia. (Thesis). Colorado State University.

Wantu, F.M. (2012). Mewujudkan kepastian hukum, keadilan dan pemanfaatan dalam putusan hakim di peradilan perdata. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3), 479-489. Diunduh dari dari http://fh.unsoed.ac.id/sites/ default/files/fileku/dokumen/JDH2012 /JDHSeptember2012/8.pdf. (6 Mei 2014).

Yin, R.K. (1996). Studi kasus, desain & metode. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Yukl, G.A. (2005). Kepemimpinan dalam organisasi. Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks.

Zainuddin, S. (2012). Berebut otoritas: antara kilau emas versus konservasi (studi kasus penambangan emas tradisional pada komunitas masyarakat ”adat” Kaili di Tahura Poboya Kota Palu Sulawesi Tengah). Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2015.12.1.27-40

Copyright (c) 2015 Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan