IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIAL FORESTRY IN PERUM PERHUTANI KPH TELAWA
Abstract
Policy on Social Forestry of The Ministry of Environment and Forestry is a translation of agrarian reform and President Joko Widodo's Nawacita. Social Forestry with IPHPS program is a specific model implemented in Perhutani working area by providing legal access for forest villagers to manage and utilize forest areas. This research is conducted at Perhutani KPH Telawa, Boyolali Regency. The aim is to analyze the implementation of IPHPS and its impact on society. Data collection is carried out by observation, interviews, and literature studies. Sample is determined by purposive sampling method. The implementation process consists of: (1) application, (2) assistance, (3) financing, (4) coaching and facilitation, (5) monitoring and evaluation. The results of the implementation are: a). Location of IPHPS does not comply with the provisions, which should be empty land for 5 consecutive years, b). The companion is not appropriate in terms of quality and quantity, c). Financing and capital are still independent of farmer groups, d). Coaching and facilitation by the IPHPS Working Group has not been effective yet, e). Monitoring and evaluation was only carried out once, f). Social, economic and ecological impacts are not yet visible.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Ambarwati, M. E., Sasongko, G., & Therik, W. M. A. (2018). Dynamics of the tenurial conflict in state forest area (case in BKPH Tanggung KPH Semarang). Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 6(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality. v6i2.23228.
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Ikhtisar hasil pemeriksaan keuangan semester I 2018. Jakarta: Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan.
Balooni, K. & Inoue, M. (2007). Decentralized forest management in South and Southeast Asia. Journal of Forestry, 105(8), 414–420. https://doi. org/10.1093/jof/105.8.414.
Dhali, P. K., Pretzsch, J., Romisch, K., & Mollick, A. S. (2012). People’s participation in participatory forest management in the sal (Shorea robusta) forests of Bangladesh: an explorative study. International Journal of Social Forestry, 5(1), 38–56.
Direktorat Jenderal Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan. (2019). Kajian dampak perhutanan sosial: perspektif ekonomi, sosial dan lingkungan. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan.
Engida, T. & Mengistu, A. T. (2013). Explaining the determinants of community based forest management: evidence from Alamata, Ethiopia. International Journal of Community Development, 1(2), 63–70. https://doi. org/10.11634/233028791301431.
Fahrudin, A. & Ariyasa, U. S. (2011). Pemberdayaan partisipasi dan penguatan kapasitas masyarakat. Bandung: Humaniora.
Helmi. (2013). Hukum perizinan lingkungan hidup. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Herawati, T., Liswanti, N., Banjade, M. R., & Mwangi, E. (2017). Forest tenure reform implementation in Lampung Province: from scenarios to action. CIFOR (Issue 169). https://doi.org/10.17528/ cifor/006418.
Kanel, K. & Dahal, G. (2008). Community forestry policy and its economic implications: an experience from Nepal. International Journal of Social Forestry, 1(1), 50–60.
Kastanya, A., Tjoa, M., Mardiatmoko, G., Latumahina, F., Bone, I., & Aponno, H. E. S. (2019). Kajian dampak Perhutanan Sosial wilayah MalukuPapua. In M. S. Yusup & M. S. L. Leleulya (Eds.), Seminar Nasional Perhutanan Sosial dan Rempah-Rempah Provinsi Maluku. Program Studi Manajemen Hutan PPs UNPATTI.
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup & Kehutanan. (2017). Perhutanan Sosial. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup & Kehutanan.
Moeliono, M., Thuy, P. T., Bong, I. W., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2017). Social forestry-why and for whom? A comparison of policies in Vietnam and Indonesia. Forest and Society, 1(2), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.2484.
Muhsi, M. A. (2017). Legal review Perhutanan Sosial. Jakarta: Multistakeholder Forestry Programme 3.
Muttaqim, A. (2013). Ekonomi-politik hutan kemasyarakatan (kajian pengelolaan hutan berbasis hak-hak produktif masyarakat sekitar). Komunika, Jurnal Dakwah & Komunikasi, 7(2).
Perum Perhutani. (2019). Profil KPH Telawa Perum Perhutani KPH Telawa Divisi Regional Jawa Tengah. Jakarta: Perum Perhutani.
Putra K, D. (2019). KPH Telawa. Semarang: Perum Perhutani Unit I Jawa Tengah.
Qurniati, R., Duryat, & Kaskoyo, H. (2018). Penguatan kelembagaan pengelola hutan desa di sekitar Gunung Rajabasa, Lampung. Jurnal Sakai Sambayan, 1(3), 80–86.
Rout, S. (2010). Collective action for sustainable forestry. Social Change, 40(4), 479–502. https:// doi.org/10.1177/004908571004000405.
Soetomo. (2012). Keswadayaan masyarakat manivestasi kapasitas masyarakat untuk berkembang secara mandiri (1 ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Steiner, A. A. & Farmer, J. (2018). Engage, participate, empower: modelling power transfer in disadvantaged rural communities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(1), 118– 138. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417701730.
Sundar, B. (2013). An analysis of the property rights of forest dependent communities: The Indian context. Vikalpa, 38(3), 79–102. https://doi. org/10.1177/0256090920130306.
Suresh, L. (2014). Governing the resource: a study of the institutions of decentralized forest resource management. Studies in Indian Politics, 2(1), 21– 41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321023014526024
Wahanisa, R. (2015). Model Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat (PHBM). Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 416-438.
Wulandari, C. & Budiono, P. (2015). Social capital status on HKm development in Lampung. In C. A. Siregar, Pratiwi, N. Mindawati, G. Pari, M. Turjaman, H. L. Tata, H. Krisnawati, T. Setyawati, Krisdianto, N. Sakuntaladewi, Z. Muttaqiem, & Jamal Balfas (Eds.), International Conference of Indonesia Forestry Researchers III (p. 877). Research, Development and Innovation Agency Ministry of Environment and Forestry- Republic of Indonesia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2021.18.1.31-43
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
