CONSERVATION CARBON PRICE ESTIMATION OF A/R CDM ACTIVITY USING FOREST ECONOMIC VALUE APPROACH IN SEKAROH PROTECTION FOREST, EAST LOMBOK

Ridwan Fauzi, Chairil Anwar Siregar

Abstract


Currently, incentive payment of carbon mechanism has not yet provided significant economic benefit for community who live in the surrounding forest area as the carbon price is relatively low. Consequently, potential carbon owners are likely to invest conserved carbon biomass into other products that give more profitable economic value.  This paper discusses the estimation of feasible carbon selling price of Sekaroh Protection Forest based on analysis of the forest economic value approach. This study was conducted  using descriptive quantitative method based on primary data sources of the Afforestation/Reforestation (A/R) Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) implementation in 2010–2013 at Sekaroh. Research results showed that based on the calculation of annual economic value (AEV), the economic value is estimated about Rp73,394,816.00 per hectare per year at the  interest rate of 5.75%. Hence, a reasonable carbon price based on the economic value is US$23 per ton carbon. This estimated value is significantly greater than the current prevailing carbon price that is US$4.6–10 per ton carbon. Higher reasonable carbon price will attract community around the forest to keep their biomass carbon stocks in the forest, so that future business of carbon trade mechanism can be more interesting and runs better.

Keywords


Sekaroh Protection Forest; carbon price; economic value.

References


Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Lombok Timur. (2014). Lombok Timur dalam angka tahun 2014. Selong: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Lombok Timur.

Bambang, D., Kartodihardjo, H., Darusman, D., & Dharmawan, A. H. (2011). Kajian dinamika kebijakan hutan kemasyarakatan dan alternatif penyelesaian konflik kepentingan pada kawasan hutan lindung di Pulau Lombok. Jurnal Agroteksos, 21(2), 165–176.

Clarke, H., & Waschik, R. (2012). Australia’s carbon pricing strategies in a global context. Journal of The Economic Record, 88 (Special Issue), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14754932.2012.00798.x

Díaz, S., Hector, A., & Wardle, D. A. (2009). Biodiversity in forest carbon sequestration initiatives: Not just a side benefit. Journal of Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2009.08.001

Dipokusumo, B. (2011). Model partisipatif perhutanan sosial menuju pengelolaan hutan berkelanjutan (Kasus pembangunan hutan kemasyarakatan pada kawasan hutan lindung di Pulau Lombok). Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Driver, K. (2012). Quantification methodology for the substitution of bitumen binder in hot asphalt production and usage. (Version 1.5). Bitumen Binder v1.5 33. Alberta: Leading Carbon Ltd.. Fauzi, A. (2010). Ekonomi sumber daya alam dan lingkungan: Teori dan aplikasi (3rd ed.). Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama,.

Friedlingstein, P., Andrew, R. M., Rogelj, J., Peters, G. P., Canadell, J. G., Knutti, R., … Le Quéré, C. (2014). Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. Journal of Nature Geoscience, 7(10), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2248

Garten, C. T., Wullschleger, S. D., & Classen, A. T. (2011). Review and model-based analysis of factors influencing soil carbon sequestration under hybrid poplar. Journal of Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(1), 214–226. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.013

Godsey, L. D. (2010). Economic budgeting for agroforestry practices. University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry, 12.

Gubernur Nusa Tenggara Barat. (2016). Upah minimum Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat tahun 2017. Mataram: Gubernur Nusa Tenggara Barat.

Hairiah, K., & Rahayu, S. (2007). Petunjuk praktis “pengukuran karbon tersimpan di berbagai macam penggunaan lahan”. Bogor: World Agroforestry Centre, ICRAF Southeast Asia.

Hamrick, K., & Goldstein, A. (2016). Raising ambition (State of the voluntary carbon markets 2016). Washington, DC: Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace.

Hanafizadeh, P., & Latif, V. (2011). Robust net present value. Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54(1–2), 233–242. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.02.005

Herman, Agus, F., & Las, I. (2009). Analisis finansial dan keuntungan yang hilang dari pengurangan emisi karbon dioksida pada perkebunan kelapa sawit. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 28(4), 127–133.

Jotzo, F. (2012). Australia’s carbon price. Journal of Nature Climate Change, 2(7), 1–2. https://doi. org/10.1038/nclimate1607

Ketterings, Q. M., Coe, R., van Noordwijk, M., Ambagau’, Y., & Palm, C. A. (2001). Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 146(1– 3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S03781127(00)00460-6

KOICA & FORDA. Project design document (PDD) - community based reforestration on degraded lands in East Lombok (2013) Indonesia. Bogor: KOICA.

Martínez de Alegría, I., Fernández-Sainz, A., Alvarez, I., Basañez, A., & del-Río, B. (2017). Carbon prices: Were they an obstacle to the launching of emission abatement projects in Spain in the Kyoto Protocol period? Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 857–865. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.154

Peskett, L., Schreckenberg, K., & Brown, J. (2011). Institutional approaches for carbon financing in the forest sector: Learning lessons for REDD+ from forest carbon projects in Uganda. Journal of Environmental Science and Policy, 14(2), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envsci.2010.10.004

Rahmat, M. (2010). Evaluasi manfaat dan biaya pengurangan emisi serta penyerapan karbondioksida pada lahan gambut di HTI. Jurnal Bumi Lestari, 10(2), 275–284.

Ramadhan, I. C., Taryono, & Wulandari, R. (2014). Keragaan pertumbuhan dan rendemen lima klon tebu (Saccharum officinarum L.) di ultisol, vertisol, dan inceptisol growth. Jurnal Vegetalika, 3(4), 77–87.

Saridevi, G. A. A. R., Atmaja, I. W. D., & Mega, I. M. (2013). Perbedaan sifat biologi tanah pada beberapa tipe penggunaan lahan di tanah andisol, inceptisol, dan vertisol. Jurnal Agroekoteknologi Tropika, 2(4), 214–223.

Siregar, C. A., & Ridwan, M. (2013). Rehabilitasi lahan di zona ekstrim belajar dari A/R CDM Lombok Timur. (A. Suharto, Ed.) (1st ed.). Bogor: RA Visindo.

Suprayitno, A. R. (2008). Pelibatan masyarakat lokal: Upaya memberdayakan masyarakat menuju hutan lestari. Jurnal Penyuluhan IPB, 4(2), 2–5. Retrieved from http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index. php/jupe/article/view/2179/1208

Taylor, A., Lippke, B., & Park, W. (2010). Carbon credit schemes for forest landowners are counter productive. Journal of Environmental Science & Policy, 13(2), 150–153. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.004

Tietenberg, T. H., & Lewis, L. (2009). Environmental and natural resource economics. In S. Yagan, D. Battista, A. D’Ambrosio, & J. Kolongowsky (Eds.), The Addison-Wesley series in economics (9th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Van Deusen, P. (2010). Carbon sequestration potential of forest land: Management for products and bioenergy versus preservation. Journal of Biomass and Bioenergy, 34(12), 1687–1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.03.007

Wang, J., Jiao, Z., & Bai, Z. (2014). Changes in carbon sink value based on RS and GIS in the Heidaigou opencast coal mine. Journal of Environmental Earth Sciences, 71(2), 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2488-7

Zhao, N., Zhuang, Y., Jin, L., Wuyun, Q., & Zhao, J. (2012). Evaluation of potential and value on grassland carbon sink - A case study in Xilinhot of inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Advanced Materials Research, 524–527, 2562–2565. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ AMR.524-527.2562

Zribi, L., Chaar, H., Khaldi, A., Henchi, B., Mouillot, F., & Gharbi, F. (2016). Estimate of biomass and carbon pools in disturbed and undisturbed oak forests in Tunisia. Journal of Forest Systems, 25(2), e060. https://doi.org/10.5424/ fs/2016252-08062




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2019.16.1.1-12

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Indexed by:

 ...More

Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan (JPSEK)
eISSN : 2502-4221 pISSN : 1979-6013
JPSEK is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.