Cover Image

The Importance of "Business Management" in Social Forestry Development in Production Forest

Tajuddin Tajuddin

Abstract


The social forestry program which aims to improve the condition of forests and the welfare of the community is a solution in forest governance in Indonesia. However, implementation of social forestry in the field still shows very low performance both qualitatively and quantitatively. Therefore, a transition to a more holistic social forestry management concept is needed, which can be pursued through the implementation of the main social forestry development strategies which include: area management, institutional management and business management. As one of the pillars in the strategy of developing social forestry, business management determines the impact of social forestry activities on improving the welfare of the community. This article aims to present the design of the activities which is needed in establishing business management on social forestry permit schemes in production forests. Analysis of the policy content and the implementation of social forestry programs using interview methods and field observations were presented in both qualitatively and descriptively. We found that, the various activities are business partnerships with corporation or Forest Management Unit, greater authority for communities to harvest forest products, simpler forest product administration regulations, incentives for processing forest products, and ease in obtaining capital support.

Keywords


Social forestry; production forest; business management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bartlett, A. G. (1992). A Review of Community Forestry Advances in Nepal. Commonwealth Forestry Review, 71(2), 95–100.

Devkota, R. R. (2010). Interests and Powers as Drivers of Community Forestry: A case study of Nepal (Vol. Ph.D). University Press Göttingen.

Dirjen RLPS. (2003). Pedoman Umum Pembuatan Rencana Teknik Social Forestry. Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Rehabilitasi Lahan dan Perhutanan Sosial No. 146/Kpts/V/2003. Jakarta: Departemen Kehutanan. Direktorat Jenderal Rehabilitasi Lahan dan Perhutanan Sosial.

Dupuits, E. (2014). Transnational self-help networks and community forestry: A theoretical framework. Forest Policy and Economics, 58, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.07.007

Gelo, D., & Koch, S. F. (2012). Does one size fit all? Heterogeneity in the valuation of community forestry programs. Ecological Economics, 74, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.010

Hajjar, R., McGrath, D. G., Kozak, R. A., & Innes, J. L. (2013). Framing community forestry challenges with a broader lens: Case studies from the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(9),2159–2169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.042

Hakim, I. (2010). Orientasi Makro Kebijakan Social Forestry di Indonesia pp 1-32 dalam : S. Anwar dan I. Hakim (Ed.). Menuju Restorasi Pembangunan Kehutanan Berkelanjutan.

Herawati, T. (2010). Komparasi Kebijakan Hutan Tanaman Rakyat dan Hutan Kemasyarakatan dalam Perspektif Teori Hak Kepemilikan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional MAPEKI (Masyarakat Peneliti Kayu Indonesia) XIII. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4768.3360

Jusuf, Y., & Fahrul, F. (2011). Analisis performasi kelembagaan kehutanan pada masa otonomi daerah (otoda) di Kabupaten Gowa, Takalar dan Jeneponto. Jurnal Hutan dan Masyarakat, 6(1), 31–42.

Kellert, S. R., Mehta, J. N., Ebbin, S. A., & Lichtenfeld, L. L. (2000). Community natural resource management: Promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society and Natural Resources, 13(8), 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419200750035575

Krisnawati, H., & Wahyono, D. (2004). Riap Diameter Tegakan Hutan Alam Rawa Bekas Tebangan di Provinsi Jambi ( Stand Diameter Increment of Logged-Over Swamp Natural Forest in Province of Jambi). Jurnal Penelitian Hutan dan Konservasi Alam. 2, 156–166.

Maryudi, A., Devkota, R. R., Schusser, C., Yufanyi, C., Salla, M., Aurenhammer, H., … Krott, M. (2012). Back to basics: Considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 14(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.017

Moeliono, M., Thuy, P. T., Waty Bong, I., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2017). Social Forestry - why and for whom? A comparison of policies in Vietnam and Indonesia. Forest and Society, 1(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.2484

Muhajir, M., Arizona, Y., Firdaus, A. Y., & Safitri, M. A. (2011). Arah Reformasi Kebijakan Penguasaan Kawasan Hutan di Indonesia. Kertas Kerja Epistema No.02/2011, Jakarta: Epistema Institute.

Ostrom, E. (1999). Self Governance and Forest Structures. CIFOR Occasional Paper, 20.

Poffenberger M. (Ed.). (1990). Keepers of the Forest: Land ManagementAlternatives in Southeast Asia. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.

Pokharel, R. K., Neupane, P. R., Tiwari, K. R., & Köhl, M. (2014). Assessing the sustainability in community based forestry: A case from Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics, 58(June 1992), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.11.006

Praputra, A. V., Sahide, M. A. K., & Santosa, A. (2015). Menata Era Baru Kehutanan Masyarakat. Policy Brief. Forum Komunikasi Kehutanan Masyarakat. Bogor., (January 2015). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4587.8249

Sabogal, C., Jong, W. de, Pokorny, B., & Louman, B. (2008). Síntesis y recomendaciones. In: Sabogal, C., de Jong, W., Pokorny, B., Louman, B. (Eds.), Manejo Forestal Comunitario en América Latina : Experiencias, lecciones aprendidas y retos para el futuro. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.

Sati, V. P. (2014). Towards Sustainable Livelihoods and Ecosystems in Mountain Regions. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03533-8

Setyarso, A., Djajono, A., Nugroho, B., Wulandari, C., Suwarno, E., Kartodihardjo, H., & Sardjono, M. A. (2014). Strategi Pengembangan KPH dan Perubahan Struktur Kehutanan Indonesia. Direktorat Jenderal Planologi Kehutanan.

Subarudi, & Ginoga, K. L. (2014). Alternatif Solusi Konflik Kehutanan Versus Kebun Kelapa Sawit : Sebuah Pembelajaran bagi Sektor Kehutanan pp. 211-230 dalam : I. Hakim dan L.R. Wibowo (Ed.). Hutan Untuk Rakyat : Jalan Terjal Reforma Agraria di Sektor Kehutan, LKiS Yogya.

Suharjito, D. (2009). Devolusi Pengelolaan Hutan di Indonesia : Perbandingan Indonesia dan Philipina (Devolution of Forest Management in Indonesia : Comparison between Indonesia and Philipina). Jmht, 15(3), 123–130.

Suharti, S., Ginoga, K. L., Murniati, Octavia, D., & Windyoningrum, A. (2017). Langkah Strategis Menuju Percepatan Realisasi Capaian Program Perhutanan Sosial. Policy Brief.Pusat Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Sosial, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Dan Perubahan Iklim. Badan Penelitian, Pengembangan Dan Inovasi Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan, 11(08), 1–8.

Sumanto, S. E. (2009). Kebijakan Pengembangan Perhutanan Sosial dalam Perspektif Resolusi Konflik. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 6(1), 13–25.

Sunderlin, W. D., Hatcher, J., & Liddle, M. (2008). From Exclusion to Ownership? Challenges and Opportunities in Advancing Forest Tenure Reform. Washington, D.C.: Rights and Resources Institute.

Supratman. (2007). Desain Unit Pengelolaan Kehutanan Masyarakat Berdasarkan Struktur Wilayah Pedesaan dan Struktur Wilayah Pengelolaan Hutan : Studi Kasus Pengelolaan Hutan Kemiridi Kabupaten Maros. Disertasi. Program Pasca Sarjana, Unhas. (Tidak Dipublikasikan).

Supratman, & Sahide, M. A. K. (2013). Hutan Desa dan Pembangunan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Desa di Kabupaten Bantaeng. Jakarta: Direktorat Bina Perhutanan Sosial.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/buleboni.5701

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Buletin Eboni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed by: