Gamin Gamin, Hariadi Kartodihardjo, Lala M Kolopaking, Rizaldi Boer


The style of the party facing a conflict (conflict style) needs tobe known to  find an effective dispute resolution. The main actors and supporting actors and interests/role and influence or power and its relationship needs to be carefully mapped. What are the actions that can be taken to resolve the conflict based on the style of the parties is something that needs to be answered in this study. In this study conflict styles of actors assessed  using conflicts style analysis (AGATA). This study shows that the conflict-style compromise, accommodation and collaboration facilitated and mediated for proposing Village Forest, Community Forest Partnership  to obtain legal recognition on managing state forest land as well as recognizing state forest, hence the issuance of permits The Village Forest and Community Forest Partnership can be  accelerated. The role of outside parties who are not related with conflict is essential to facilitate and mediate the parties to a conflict resolution. Competing parties need  to be  mediated so his style could change to compromise, accommodation or collaboration. Even if his style would remains unchanged it  will result in a constructive option to acquire rights to the land through forest discharge process. To the avoiding-style party an  intensive communication needs to be done  in order to be aware of the conflict or change his style to compromise.


Conflict; actors; conflict style; facilitation; mediation; village forest.

Full Text:



Alberti, R.E. & Emmons, M.L. (2002). Your perfect right. (Buditjahya, Trans). Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Computindo.

Avruch, K., Black, P.W., Scimecca, J.A. (1991). Conflict Resolution; Cross-Cultural Perspective. Westport. USA: Preager Publishers.

Cavestro, L. (2003). P.R.A.-Participatory Rural Apprasisal Concepts Methodologies and Techniques. Rome. Italia: Universita' Degli Atudi Di Padova, Facolta' Di Agraria, Dipartimento Terrirorio E Sistemi AgroForestali. Master In Cooperazione Allo Sciluppo Nelle Aree Rurali.

[CERIndo] & [CCAP] Carbon and Environmental Research Indonesia dan Center for Clean Air Policy. (2010). Establishing Integrated Forest Policies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation at District Level. The District of Musi Rawas, South Sumatra. Bogor: CERIndo.

CERIndo, [FORDA] Forestry Research Departement Agency, [MoF] Ministry of Forestry, and [MRDG] Musi Rawas District Government. (2010). Report on Studi: Establishing Integrated Forest Policies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation at District Level. Focus Area : The Distric of Mus Rawas, South Sumatra. Bogor: CERIndo.

CERIndo & CCAP. (2011). Establishing Integrated Forest Policies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation at District Level. The District of Musi Rawas, South Sumatra. Bogor: CERIndo.

Epistema. (2011). Menuju Kepastian dan Keadilan Tenurial. Jakarta: Epistema.

Faith NAF. (2012). An analysis of the land tenure system and its implication for smallholder farmer in Njombe (Cameroon) [tesis]. Dschang. Camerun: Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences The University of Dschang.

Fisher, S., Ludin, J., Williams, S., Abdi, D.I., Smith, R., Williams, S. (2001). Mengelola Konflik: Keterampilan & Strategi untuk bertindak. (Kartikasari, S.N., M.D. Tapilatu, R. Maharani, D. N. Rini, (Trans.); S.N. Kartikasari (editor). Jakarta. Indonesia: The British Council.

Fruedenberger, K.S. (1999). Rapid Rural Appraissal (RRA) and Participatory Rural Appraissal (PRA) A Manual for CRS Field Workers and Partners. www.ers,org (diunduh dari ge/pubs/me/RRAPRA.pdf, pada tanggal 3 Juli 2013.

Galudra, G., Pasya, G., Sirait, M., Fay, C. (2006). Rapid Land Tenure Assessment (RaTA) Panduan Ringkas Bagi Praktisi. Bogor: World Agroforestry Centre-Asia Tenggara. Galudra, G., Sirait, M., Pasya, G., Fay, C., Suyanto, Noordwijk, Mvan., Pradhan, U. (2010). Rata: A Rapid Land Tenure Assessment Manual for Identifying the Nature of Land Tenure Conflicts. Bogor: World Agroforestry Centre.

Irawan, P. (2006). Penelitian Kulitatif & Kuantitatif Untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta. Indonesia: Departemen Ilmu Administrasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Indonesia.

Isenhart, M.W. & Spangle, M. (2000). Collaborative Approaches to Resolving Conflict. London: Sage Publications. Inc.

Kartodihardjo, H & Jhamtani, H. (2006). Politik Lingkungan dan Kekuasaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Equinox Publishing.

Kriesberg, L. (1998). Constructive Conflicts From Escalation to Resolution. Maryland. USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publisher, Inc.

Malik, I., Wijardjo, B., Fauzi, N., Royo, A. (2003). Menyeimbangkan Kekuatan Pilihan Strategi Menyelesaikan Konflik atas Sumberdaya Alam. Jakarta: Yayasan Kemala.

Ostrom, E. (2008). The Challenge of Common-Pool Resources. J. Environment 50 (4): 8-21 Pasya, G. & Sirait, M.T. (2011). Analisa Gaya Bersengketa-AGATA. Panduan Ringkas untuk Membantu Memilih Bentuk Penyelesaian Sengketa Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam. Bogor: Samdhana Institute.

Pruitt, D.G. & Rubin, J.Z.. (1986). Teori Konflik Sosial (Soetjipto, H.P., & S.M. Soetjipto, Trans.). Dari : Social Conflict Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Rahim, M.A. & Magner, N.R. (1995). Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Styles of Handling Interpersonal Conflict: FirstOrder Factor Model and Its Invariance Across Groups. J. Applied Psychology, 80 (1), 122-132.

Reed, S.M., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Huback, K., et al. (2009). Who's in and why? A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis methods for Natural Resources Management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 19331949.

Ribot, J.C. & Peluso, N.L. (2003). A Theory of Access. J. Rural Sociology, 68 (2), 153-181.

Sugiyono. (2010). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suporahardjo. (2000). Inovasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Hutan. Bogor: Pustaka LATIN.

Tajudin, Dj. (2000). Manajemen Kolaborasi. Bogor: LATIN. Thomas, K.W. & Kilmann, R.P. (1974). Thomas Kilmann conflict mode instrument. CA: Mountain View. Xicom and CPP.

Wirawan. (2010). Konflik dan Manajemen Konflik Teori, Aplikasi, dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Wulan, Y.C., Yasmi, Y., Purba, C., Wollenberg, E. (2004). Analisa Konflik Sektor Kehutanan di Indonesia 1997-2003. Bogor: CIFOR. Yin, R.K. (1996). Studi Kasus, Desain & Metode. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.


Copyright (c) 2015 Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan