Autor(s): Lukas Rumboko Wibowo, Digby Race, Allan Curtis
DOI: 10.20886/ijfr.2013.10.2.67-78


”Carbon offsetting”in forestry-related projects is widely regarded as the ideal solution to the three challenges of   the  21st Century:  climate change, biodiversity conservation  andsocio-economic development. At the same time, there is scepticism about the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and  Forest  Degradation (REDD)  proposal  particularly because of   the  weak  governance and institutional capacities in many developing countries, which could jeopardize the delivery of benefits at the local level. One major problem is that most people have little knowledge on the causes and consequences of the climate change. This is partly because the information  is largely scattered among scientific journals, and obscured by jargon and sophisticated  mathematical  models. Consequently, REDD+ is beyond thereach of  manyof the people affected by REDD+. This  paper examines the efforts and the capacity of  the local governments and other development  agents in explaining the REDD + issues and its impacts on the local people, especially customary communities. The research shows that lack of  policy communication and promotion, as well as consultations with the affected groups arethe main contributing factors to latent and manifest conflicts. In turn, this conflicth as proven that NGOs,  district governments and scientists have not been successful intermediaries. Thus, in the future policy communication on REDD+ should beaimed at improved network formation (i.e. between farmer groups with business partners and NGOs  and other related actors), learning, negotiation and relationship building (i.e. between members of farmer groups,  not only withtheir leaders within the farmer groups but also with governmental and business sectors). Policy communication should also create a  new  configuration of   support  and  services in  form  of   advocacy, empowerment and management skills and technical skills for conserving their natural resources, for adaptation to climate change and building more equitable governance and transparency at local level.


Climate change; REDD+; communication; innovation; conflict

Full Text:



Adhikari, B. (2009). Reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation: Some issues and considerations. Journal of Forest and Livelihood,, 8(1), 14-24.

Agrawal, A. (2008). The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. IFRI Working Paper W08I 3. International Forestry Resources and Institutions Program. Michigan: School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan.

Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 625-649.

Chaudhary, P., & Arya, K. (2009). Global warming in Nepal: challenges and policy imperatives. Journal of Forest and livelihood, 8(1), 4-13.

Dewuf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Aarts, N., Lewicki , R., Bouwen, R., et al. (2005). Disentangling approach to farming: mapping the terrain. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the International Association for Conflict Management June 12-15th 2005, Seville, (pp. 1-24).

Ferari, A. (2010). Communicating climate change, REDD and political ecology: A global land question and prospects for agroecology (Proceedings , 9th European I F S A Symposium, Vienna (Austria), 4-7 July 2010. Retrieved 2010 28, 2012, from

Fischhoff, B. (2007). Nonpersuasive communication about matters of greatest urgency: Climate change. Environmental Science & Technology, 41, 7204-7208.

Hendry, L. (2005). Exploring the Six Sigma phenomenon using multiple case study evidence. Lancaster: The Department of Management Science Lancaster University Management School.

Indonesia Forest Climate Alliance. (2007). Pioneering work on Reduced Emission from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) in Indonesia. Discussion Notes. Indonesia Forest Climate Alliance.

Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 849-860.

Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Operationalizing demand-driving agricultural research: Institutional influences in a public and private system of research planning in The Netherlands. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 15(2), 161-175.

Leeuwis, C. (2003). Fields of conflict and castles in the air. Some thoughts and observations on the role of communication in public sphere innovation processes. This article is modified version of the inaugural speech given by the author on the 24th of April 2003 on the occasion of his accession to the post of professor of Communication and Innovation Studies at Wageningen University

Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N. (2010). Rethinking communication in innovation processes: creating space for change in complex systems. 9th European IFSA Symposium, 4-7 July 2010 Vienna (Austria) WS1.1 Innovation and change facilitation for rural development.

Leeuwis, C., & Hall, A. (2010). Facing the challenges of climate change and food security: the role of research, extension and communication institution . Assignment commissioned by the Research and Extension Branch at FAO, Rome Final Report October 2010. Wageningen University.

Lindayati, R. (2003). Ideas and institutions in social forestry oolicy. In I. A. Resosudamo, & C. J. Colfer (Eds.), Which way forward? People, forest and policy making in Indonesia. Washington DC, USA: Resource for the Future and the Centre for International Forestry Research.

Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: Actors perspectives. London : Routledge.

Long, N. (2002). An actor-oriented approach to development intervention. Paper Presented at the Background paper prepared for APO Meeting Tokyo 22-26 April 2002.

Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate hange: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 31–53

Noordwijk, V. M., Mulyoutami, E., Sakuntaladewi, N., & Agus, F. (2008). Swiddens in transition: shifted perceptions on shifting cultivators in Indonesia. Bogor: ICRAF.

Ockwell, D., Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2009). Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation grass - roots engagement? Science Communication, 30(3), 305-327.

Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations (1st ed.). New York: Free Press.

Russill, C., & Nyssa, Z. (2009). The tipping point trend in climate change communication. Global Environmental Change, 19, 336-344.

Sofaer, S. (1999). Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? Health Services Research, 34(5), 1101-1118.

Staddon, S. (2009). Carbon financing and community forestry: a review of the questions, challenges and the case of Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 8(1), 25-32.

Sunito, S. (2005). Continuation and discontinuation of local institution in community based natural resource management. Phd Thesis. Kasel University.

The Ministry of Forestry. (2008). Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in Indonesia. Indonesia: The Ministry of Forestry.

Van den Ban, A. W. (1974). Inleiding tot de voorlichting skunde. Amsterdam: Boom.

Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Rev ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Yin, R. K. (1994a). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publication Inc.

Yin, R. K. (1994b). Discovering the future of the case study: method in evaluation research. American Journal of Evaluation, 15, 283-290 doi: 10.1177/109821409401500309.


  • There are currently no refbacks.