Autor(s): Liliana Baskorowati, Mudji Susanto, Prasetyono Prasetyono, Noor Kartikawati, Anto Rimbawanto
DOI: 10.20886/ijfr.2012.9.2.73-80


Family variation of capsule production and the seed viability in the Paliyan full-sib trial of Melaleuca cajuputi subsp. cajuputi, at Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta, were observed. The full-sib trial was designed as Incomplete Block Design, consisting of 39 families; six individual as tree plot and replicated in eight blocks. Height and diameter at breast height were assessed to identify the correlation between capsule category and growth performance. The capsule production was assessed visually to one of the capsule categories: “0” for none; “1” for light; “2” for medium and “3” for heavy. Results showed that each family of M. cajuputi sub sp. cajuputi equally contributed  to the seed production.   Progeny analysis showed that the seed productions were not strongly under genetic control (h2i) = 0.12. This study also found positive correlation between the flowering strength (the flower production levels) and the number of capsule (R2=0.279). However, there were no significant differences between the flowering levels and the viability of M. cajuputi sub sp. cajuputi. Mean seed viability was 31%,  there were no significantly differences of capsules production between trees having high flowering intensity and low flowering intensity. Low seed viability was assumed due to the unsynchronicity of flowering, leading to the low levels of outcrossing rate. Therefore, selection of families with synchronicity of flowering was recommended to establish a seed orchard.


Seed production; seed viability; genetic control; flowering

Full Text:



Baskorowati L., R. Umiyati, N.K. Kartikawati, A. Rimbawanto and M. Susanto. 2008. Pembungaan dan pembuahan Melaleuca cajuputi sub sp. Cajuputi Powell. di kebun benih semai Paliyan, Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pemuliaan Tanaman Hutan 2 (2): 189-202.

Baskorowati L., M.W. Moncur, S.A. Cunningham, J.C. Doran and P.J. Kanowski. 2010. Reproductive biolog y of Melaleuca alternifolia (Myrtaceae): 2 incompatibility and pollen transfer in relation to the breeding system Australian Journal of Botany 58(5): 384-391.

Bosch, M. and N.M. Waser. 1999. Effect of local density on pollination and reproduction in Delphinium nuttalianum and

Aconitum columbianum (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany 86(6): 871-879.

Butcher, P.A., J.C. Bell, and G.F. Moran. 1992. Patterns of genetic diversity and nature of the breeding system in Melaleuca alternifolia (Myrtaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 40: 365 - 375.

Craven, L.A., 1999. Behind the names: the botany of tea tree, cajuput and niaouli. In: Southwell I. and R. Lowe. (Eds.) Tea Tree the Genus Melaleuca, Harwood Academic Publishers, Australia, pp. 11 - 28. Cunningham, S.A., 2000. What determines the number of seed produced in a flowering event? A case study of Calyptrogyneghies breghtiana (Arecaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 48: 659-665.

Doran, J.C. and G.F. Moran. 2002. Development of DNA markers for breeding of tea tree. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. CSIRO, Canberra, 45 pp.

Doran, J.C., A. Rimbawanto, B.V. Gunn and A. Nirsatmanto. 1998. Breeding plan for Melaluca cajuputi sub sp. cajuputi in Indonesia. Technical Report No. 98/178, CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, Canberra, Australia, 60 pp.

Duncan, D.H., A.B. Nicotra and S.A. Cunningham. 2004. High self-pollen transfer and low fruit set in buzz-pollinated Dianella revolute (Phormiaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 52: 185-193.

Gunn B.V., M.W. McDonald, D. Lea, B. Leksono, and J. Nahusana. 1997. Ecology, seed and leaf collections of Cajuput (Melaleucacajuputi) from Indonesia and Australia. IPGRI Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter IPGRI Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 112: 36-43.

Griffin, A.R., C.Y. Wong, R. Wickneswari and E. Chia. 1992. Mass production of hybrid seed of Acacia mangium x Acacia auriculiformis inbiclonal seed orchards. In: L. T. Carron and K. M. Aken. Breeding technologies for tropical acacias (Eds.) ACIAR Canberra, pp. 70-75.

Hendrati, R.L., L. Baskorowati and N. Kartikawati. 2002. Reproductive biology of Melaleuca cajuputi sub sp. cajuputi. In: A. Rimbawanto and M. Susanto. (eds.) Proceedings International Seminar 'Advances in Genetic Improvement of Tropical Tree Species', Centre for Forest Biotechnology and Tree Improvement, Jogjakarta, Indonesia, pp. 139 -143.

House, S.M., 1997. Reproductive biology of eucalypts. In: J. E. Williams and J. C. Z. Woinarski. (Eds.) Eucalypt Ecolog y, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 30-50.

Jackson, D.I. and Sweet, G.B., 1972. Flower initiation in temperate woody plants. Horticultural Abstracts 42: 9 - 24.

Kartikawati, N. K., 2005. Tingkat inkompatibilitas bersilang sendiri pada tanaman kayu putih (The level of self-incompatibility of Melaleuca cajuputi sub sp. cajuputi). Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman, 2: 141 - 147.

Kramer, P.J. and T.T. Kozlowski. 1960. Physiology of trees. Mc Grow Hill Book Company, New York, 624 pp.

Kunin, W.E., 1997. Population size and density effects in pollination: Pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassia kaber. The Journal of Ecology 85: 225 -234.

Mathews, J. D., 1963. Factors effecting the production of seed by forest trees. Forestry Abstracts 24: i-xiii.

Meskimen, G.F., 1962. A silvical study of the Melaleuca quinquenervia tree in South Florida. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida. 177 pp.

Moran, G.F., 1992. Patterns of genetic diversity in Australia tree species. New Forests 6: 49 - 66.

Owen, J. N., P. Sornsathapornkul and S. Tangmitcharoen. 1991. Manual Studying Flowering and Seed Ontogeny in Tropical Forest Trees, ASEAN-Canada, Forest Tree Seed Centre Project, Muak Lek Saraburi, Thailand, 134 pp.

Payne, R.W., P.W. Lane, A.E. Ainsley, K.E. Bicknell, P.G.N. Digby, S.A. Harding, P.K. Leech, H.R. Simpson, A.D. Tood, P.J. Verrier, R.P. White, J.C. Gower, and G. Tunnicliffe-Wilcon. 1987.Genstat 5 Refference Manual. Oxford University Press, New York, 749pp.

Pinyopusarerk, K., A. Kalinganire, E.R. Williams, and K.M. Aken. 2004. Evaluation of International Provenance Trials of Casuarina sequisetifolia. ACIAR Technical Reports No. 58e, Canberra, 106 pp.

Rimbawanto A., N.K. K ar tikawati, L.Baskorowati, M. Susanto and Prastyono. 2009. Status terkini pemuliaan Melaleuca cajuputi. Prosiding ekspose hasil-hasil penelitian Balai B esar Pe nelitian Bioteknologi dan Pemuliaan Tanaman Hutan, 1 Oktober, pp. 148-157.

Robinson, R. W., P.I. Boon and P. Bailey. 2006. Germination characteristics of Melaleuca ericifolia Sm. (swamp paper bark) and their implications for the rehabilitation of coastal wetlands. Marine and Freshwater Research 57:703-711.

Rosseto, M., R.W. Slade, P.R. Baverstock, R.J. Henry, and L.S.Slee. 1999. Microsatelite variation and assessment of genetic structure in tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia - Myrtaceae). Molecular Ecology 8: 633 -643.

Turnbull, J. and J. Doran. 1987. Seed development and germination in the Myrtaceae. In: P. Langkamp. P. (Eds.) Germination of Australian Native Plant Seed. Inkata Press,Melbourne, pp. 46 - 57.

Williams, E.R., A.C. Matheson and C.E. Hardwood. 2002. Experimental Design and Analysisfor Tree Improvement. Second edition, CSIRO Publishing, Australia, 214 pp. Yamada, H.,

P. Tambunan, F. Mangkuwibowo, R.L. Hendrati and C. Osamu. 2001. Study on the prediction of seed production in seedling seed orchards of Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus pellita. FTIP-P2-No.28, JICA and FORDA, 65 pp.

Young, A., T. Boyle and T. Brown. 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11 (10): 413-418.


  • There are currently no refbacks.