ANALYSIS OF STAKEHOLDERS ROLE IN BENGAWAN SOLO UPSTREAMS WATERSHED MANAGEMENT

C Yudi Lastiantoro, S Andy Cahyono

Abstract


Public participation increasingly required in resouces management decision-making. Necessary understanding of who affected by decisions, and who had the power to influence and interest to decision. The purpose of this study was to analyze the role of the parties in the management of the Upper Bengawan Solo Watershed. The study was conducted in the Upper Bengawan Solo Watershed which located in Wonogiri District using qualitative approach and stakeholder analysis methods. The results indicated that there were number of stakeholders who had a major interest and influence in the success of watershed management. Duties and functions determined the degree of influence and interests of the institution. This implies that policy makers in watershed management should take into account their aspirations in achieving successul of Upper Solo watershed management. Coordination is necessary in order to avoid overlap, duplication, and achievement of goals.




Keywords


stakeholder analysis; stakeholders; watershed management role

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alviya, I., Salminah, M., Arifanti, V.B., Maryani, R. dan Syahadat, E. (2012). Persepsi para pemangku kepentingan terhadap pengelolaan lanskap hutan di daerah aliran sungai Tulang Bawang. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 9(4), 171-184.

Balitbang Kimpraswil Puskim. 2004. Pemberdayaan perkumpulan petani pemakai air (P3A). Jakarta: Pusat Kajian SBEW.

Blackstock, K.L., Waylen, K.A., Dunglinson, J., Marshall, K.M. (2012). Linking process to outcomes-internal and external criteria for a stakeholder involment in river basin management planning. Ecological Economics, 77, 113122.

Brinkerhoff, D.W. and Crosby, L. (2002). Managing policy reform: Concepts and tool for decesion makers in developing countries and transition countries. USA: Kumarian Press Inc.

Bryson, J.M. (2003). What to do when stakeholder matter: A guide to stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Paper presented at the London School of Economics and Political Science. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.

Colfer, C.J.P., Prabu, R., Gronter, M., McDougall, C., Porro, M.M, & Porro, M. (1999). Siapa yang perlu dipertimbangkan. Menilai kesejahteraan manusia dalam pengelolaan hutan lestari (terjemahan). Bogor: SMK Grafika Mardi Yuana.

Fatahillah, M. (2013). Kajian keterpaduan lembaga dalam pengelolaan daerah aliran sungai (DAS) Garang Provinsi Jawa Tengah. (Skripsi). Semarang: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.

Instruksi Menteri Kehutanan No: INS.3/ Menhut-II/2009 tentang luas DAS/Sub DAS Wilayah SWP DAS Solo.

Grimble, R. (1998). Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management. Socio-economic methodologies, best practice guidelines. Chatham. UK.

Mairi, K., Iwanuddin, Hidayah, H.N., Karundeng, M.C dan Jafaruddin. (2010). Sistem kelembagaan pengelolaan DAS hulu (dalam Kabupaten). (Laporan Hasil Penelitian). Manado: Balai Kehutanan Manado.

Martin, E. & Winarno, B. (2010). Peran para pihak dalam pemanfaatan lahan gambut: Studi kasus di Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ilir, Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 7(2), 81-95.

Meinzen-Dick, R., DiGregorio, M., & McCarthy, N. (2004). Methods for studying collective action in rural development. Agricultural Systems, 82(3), 197-214.

Mitroff, I. dan Linstone, H. (1993). The unbounded mind. New York: Oxford University Press. Paimin, Sukresno, dan Purwanto. (2006). Sidik cepat degradasi Sub DAS. Bogor: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hutan dan Konservasi Alam.

Puspitojati, T., Darusman, D., Tarumingkeng, R.C., & Purnama, B. (2012). Pemangku kepentingan yang perlu diberdayakan dalam pengelolaan hutan produksi: Studi kasus di kesatuan pemangkuan hutan Bogor. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 9(3), 190-201.

Reed, M.S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., … , & Stringer, L.C. (2009). Who's in and why A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009(90): 1933-1949.

Rosalina. (2010). Dua puluh dua DAS Kritis di Indonesia. Diunduh 20 Maret 2014 dari http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2010/ 10/19/173285772/22-DAS-di-Indonesiadalam-Keadaan-Kritis.

Tarlock, A.D. 2003. The potential role of local governments in watershed management. Pace environmental law review. Paper 455. http://digitalcommons. pace.edu/envlaw/455.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2015.12.3.203-212

Copyright (c) 2015 Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan