DECISIONS MAKING PROCESS IN ORGANIC STIMULANT INNOVATION ADOPTIONS USING STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS
Abstract
Wood vinegar-based stimulant is potential to be developed in Perhutani, therefore, the process of adoption is indispersable to be analyzed. This study aims at identifying the involved stakeholders and analysing the relationships among stakeholders in the policy of adopting stimulant innovation in Perhutani areas. Respondents are selected using a snowball sampling method. Stakeholder analysis is performed by using Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM) while stakeholder relations analysis is carried out by classifying the relation into five categories: interaction, continuity, synergy, strength, and the presence or absence of conflicts. The results shows that the stakeholders involved in the stimulants innovation adoption policy are mostly in Quadrant IV or performs that Perhutani officials have legal authority in decision-making process. The pine tappers in Quadrant I implies that they have limited influence to stimulants innovation adoption policy but they have enormous interest in the management of pine forests. Academicians, researchers, forest rangers, forestry services officials and Ministry of Environment and Forestry officials are in Quadrant II. They play important role as intermediaries or facilitators and have considerable influence on decision-making process. Interaction, synergy and relationship continuity among stakeholders are well-established, except among researchers and academicians. Meanwhile, they could colaborate research with Perhutani.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Darmaji, P. (2009). Teknologi asap cair dan aplikasinya pada pangan dan hasil pertanian (Pidato pengukuhan jabatan Guru Besar dalam bidang teknologi pangan dan hasil pertanian pada Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Dubois, O. (1998). Capacity to manage role changes in forestry. London: International Institute for Environment Development.
Febriyano, I. G. (2014). Politik ekologi pengelolaan mangrove di Kabupaten Pesawaran Provinsi Lampung (Disertasi Pascasarjana). Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
Ferreti, V. (2016). From stakeholders analysis to cognitive mapping and multi-attribute value theory: an integrated approach for policy support. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(2), 524–541.
Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011). A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 223–240.
Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2009). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 8–74.
Herawati, T., Widjayanto, N., Saharuddin, & Eriyatno. (2010). Analisis respon pemangku kepentingan di daerah terhadap kebijakan hutan tanaman rakyat. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 7(1), 13–25.
Ichsan, A. C., Soekmadi, R., Adiwibowo, S., & Kusmana, C. (2017). Peran pemangku kepentingan dalam pelaksanaan model desa konservasi di Taman Nasional Gunung Rinjani. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 14(1), 47–59.
Li, T., S., T., & Skitmore, M. (2012). Conflict or consensus : an investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 36(2), 333–342.
Maguire, B., Potss, J., & Fletcher, S. (2012). The role of stakeholders in the marine planning processstakeholder analysis within the solent, United Kingdom. Marine Policy, 36(1), 246–257.
Marimin, M. (2009). Teori dan aplikasi sistem pakar dalam teknologi manajerial. Bogor: IPB Press.
Nurfitriani, F., Darusman, D., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Yustika, A. E. (2015). Analisis pemangku kepentingan dalam transformasi kebijakan fiskal hijau(stakeholder analysis in green fiscal policy transformation). Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 12(2), 105–124.
Pari, G., & Nurhayati, T. (2009). Cuka kayu dari tusam dan limbah campuran industri penggergajian kayu untuk kesehatan tanaman dan obat. Bogor.
Rangkuti, P.A. (2009). Strategi komunikasi membangun kemandirian pangan. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 28(2), 39–45.
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.
Rodrigues, K. C. S., Apel, M. A., Henrique, A. T., & Neto, F. A. G. (2011). Efficient oleoresin biomass production in pines using low cost metal containing stimulant paste. Journal Crops and Product, 35(10), 4442–4448.
Rodrigues, K. C. S., Azevedo, P. C. N., Sobreiro, L. E., Pelissari, P., & Fett-Neto, A. G. (2008). Oleoresin yield of Pinus elliottii plantations in subtropical cLimate: effect of tree diameter, wound shape and concentration of active adjuvants in resin stimulating paste. Journal Crops and Product, 27(3), 322–327.
Sainoi, T., & Sdoodee, S. (2012) The impact of ethylene gas aplication on young tapping rubber trees. Journal of Agriculture Technology,8(4), 1497–1507.
Saxena, J. P., Sushil, & Vrat, P. (1992). Hierarchy and classification of program plan elements using interpretive structural modeling : a case study of energy conservation in the Indian Cement Industry. Systems Practice, 5(6), 651–652.
Sharma, K. R., & Lekha, C. (2013). Tapping of Pinus roxburghii (chir pine) for oleoresin in Himachal Pradesh, India, 2(3), 51–55.
Sundawati, L., & Sanudin, S. (2009). Analisis Pemangku Kepentingan dalam Upaya Pemulihan Ekosistem Daerah Tangkapan Air Danau Toba. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 15(3), 102–110.
Wijaya, M. (2010). Pirolisis limbah kayu dan bambu yang ramah lingkungan untuk menghasilkan asam asetat. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Verhagen, K. (1996). Pengembangan keswadayaan : Pengalaman LSM di tiga negara. Cimanggis: Pustaka Pembangunan Swadaya Nusantara (PUSPA SWARA).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2019.16.1.1-10
Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
