STRATEGY REVIEW OF REGIONAL SPATIAL PLANNING ON FOREST AREA

Epi Syahadat, Elvida Yosefi Suryandari, Andri Setiadi Kurniawan

Abstract


Spatial planning that only prioritizes economic interests has serious environmental impacts. The aims of this paper are: 1) Reviewing spatial planning policy based on spatial plans, 2) Identifying problems of spatial arrangement of forest area, and 3) Finding strategy for solving spatial settlement problems. The result of the study shows that there is disharmony between spatial planning policies of the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, it requires harmonization and synchronization in its implementation. Problems in spatial planning are: 1) Spatial planning in several regions has not received the main proportion as a basic instrument for the preparation of regional development program plans, 2) Conflict of spatial use between society and government, 3) Dichotomy of interest in spatial plans from excavating local revenue from natural resources without and or less attention to environmental impacts and space, 4) Inefficiency of spatial planning institute as well as supervision of space utilization. Strategy to solve spatial problems in revised spatial plans can be implemented through: 1) Changing designation and function of forest area, 2) Integrating teamwork acceleration of forest area designation and function, and 3) Implementating forest area utilization audit based on sustainability forest.


Keywords


Spatial planning; dichotomy of interest; sustainability forest.

References


Darmaji, P. (2009). Teknologi asap cair dan aplikasinya pada pangan dan hasil pertanian (Pidato pengukuhan jabatan Guru Besar dalam bidang teknologi pangan dan hasil pertanian pada Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Dubois, O. (1998). Capacity to manage role changes in forestry. London: International Institute for Environment Development.

Febriyano, I. G. (2014). Politik ekologi pengelolaan mangrove di Kabupaten Pesawaran Provinsi Lampung (Disertasi Pascasarjana). Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Ferreti, V. (2016). From stakeholders analysis to cognitive mapping and multi-attribute value theory: an integrated approach for policy support. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(2), 524–541.

Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011). A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 223–240.

Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2009). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 8–74.

Herawati, T., Widjayanto, N., Saharuddin, & Eriyatno. (2010). Analisis respon pemangku kepentingan di daerah terhadap kebijakan hutan tanaman rakyat. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 7(1), 13–25.

Ichsan, A. C., Soekmadi, R., Adiwibowo, S., & Kusmana, C. (2017). Peran pemangku kepentingan dalam pelaksanaan model desa konservasi di Taman Nasional Gunung Rinjani. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 14(1), 47–59.

Li, T., S., T., & Skitmore, M. (2012). Conflict or consensus : an investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 36(2), 333–342.

Maguire, B., Potss, J., & Fletcher, S. (2012). The role of stakeholders in the marine planning processstakeholder analysis within the solent, United Kingdom. Marine Policy, 36(1), 246–257.

Marimin, M. (2009). Teori dan aplikasi sistem pakar dalam teknologi manajerial. Bogor: IPB Press.

Nurfitriani, F., Darusman, D., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Yustika, A. E. (2015). Analisis pemangku kepentingan dalam transformasi kebijakan fiskal hijau(stakeholder analysis in green fiscal policy transformation). Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 12(2), 105–124.

Pari, G., & Nurhayati, T. (2009). Cuka kayu dari tusam dan limbah campuran industri penggergajian kayu untuk kesehatan tanaman dan obat. Bogor.

Rangkuti, P.A. (2009). Strategi komunikasi membangun kemandirian pangan. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 28(2), 39–45.

Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.

Rodrigues, K. C. S., Apel, M. A., Henrique, A. T., & Neto, F. A. G. (2011). Efficient oleoresin biomass production in pines using low cost metal containing stimulant paste. Journal Crops and Product, 35(10), 4442–4448. Rodrigues, K. C. S., Azevedo, P. C. N., Sobreiro, L. E., Pelissari, P., & Fett-Neto, A. G. (2008). Oleoresin yield of Pinus elliottii plantations in subtropical cLimate: effect of tree diameter, wound shape and concentration of active adjuvants in resin stimulating paste. Journal Crops and Product, 27(3), 322–327.

Sainoi, T., & Sdoodee, S. (2012) The impact of ethylene gas aplication on young tapping rubber trees. Journal of Agriculture Technology,8(4), 1497–1507.

Saxena, J. P., Sushil, & Vrat, P. (1992). Hierarchy and classification of program plan elements using interpretive structural modeling : a case study of energy conservation in the Indian Cement Industry. Systems Practice, 5(6), 651–652.

Sharma, K. R., & Lekha, C. (2013). Tapping of Pinus roxburghii (chir pine) for oleoresin in Himachal Pradesh, India, 2(3), 51–55.

Sundawati, L., & Sanudin, S. (2009). Analisis Pemangku Kepentingan dalam Upaya Pemulihan Ekosistem Daerah Tangkapan Air Danau Toba. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 15(3), 102–110.

Wijaya, M. (2010). Pirolisis limbah kayu dan bambu yang ramah lingkungan untuk menghasilkan asam asetat. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Verhagen, K. (1996). Pengembangan keswadayaan : Pengalaman LSM di tiga negara. Cimanggis: Pustaka Pembangunan Swadaya Nusantara (PUSPA SWARA).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2019.16.2.89-103

Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.