RELATIONSHIP BEETWEEN SOCIAL CAPITAL WITH UTILIZATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF PROTECTED FOREST

Sulistya Ekawati, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat

Abstract


The concept of social capital and collective action began to receive attention in common pool resources management such as in the case of protected forest.  Forms of social capital in this study were social leadership, custom/cultural/local knowledge, beliefs and social institutions. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between social capital, economic benefits and ecological benefits of protected forest. The study was conducted in three regencies, namely East Tanjung Jabung and Sarolangun (Jambi Province) and South Solok (West Sumatra Province). Data were collected through interviews, focus group discussions and field observations. Data analysis was performed with the program SPSS 17.0 Statistics to estimate the curve on the menu regression analysis. The result showed: the social capital (refer to actor perspective and public perspective) positively correlated with the sustainability of protected forest; the correlation of economic benefits received by forest communities and forest sustainability was negative; the ecological benefits positively correlated with forest sustainability.


Keywords


Social capital; sustainability; economic benefit; ecological benefit; protected forest.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ancok, D. (2003). Modal Sosial dan Kualitas Masyarakat. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar pada Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada. 3 Mei 2003. Yogyakarta.

Arief, A. (2001). Hutan dan Kehutanan. Jakarta: Kanisius.

Basyaib, F. (2007). Teori Pembuatan Keputusan. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Eds). Handbook of Theory and Research for Sociology of Education (pp.241258). New York: Greenwood Press.

Dohon, A. (2012). Gambaran Umum Kegiatan Program Climate, Forest and Peatlands in Indonesia di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Kalimantan Tengah: Wetland International.

Fauzi, A. (2004). Ekonomi Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Gilo, W. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Gurajati, D.N. (2007). Dasar-Dasar Ekonometrika Jilid I. Julius A.M., penerjemah. Surabaya: Erlangga. Judul asli: Essential of Econometrics.

Ishihara, H. dan Pascual, U. (2008). Social Capital in Community Level Environmental Governance: A critique. Great Britain: Elsevier.

Hasbullah, J. (2006). Social Capital (Menuju Keunggulan Budaya Manusia Indonesia). Jakarta: MR-United Press.

Hermawanti dan Rinandari. (2003). Penguatan dan pengembangan Modal Sosial Masyarakat Adat. Yogyakarta: Institute For Research And Empowerment (IRE) - Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Adat.

Kementerian Sosial. (2009). Modal Sosial Komunitas Adat Terpencil. Http:// www.kemsos.go.id. Diakses tanggal 30 Agustus 2012.

Limin, S. (2006). Pemanfaatan lahan Gambut danPermasalahannya. Jakarta: CIMTROP.

Prusak, L. and Cohen, D. (2002). In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Works. Boston: Havard Business School Press.

Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Priceton: Priceton University Press.

Suhardjito, D dan Saputro, G. (2008). Modal Sosial dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan pada Masyarakat Kasepuhan Banten Kidul. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Kehutanan.Vol 5 No 4. Desember 2008. Hal 317-335. Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Kehutanan. Departemen Kehutanan. Bogor.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2014.11.1.40-53

Copyright (c) 2015 Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan