Supply Chain Risk Management of Pine Resin by using the House of Risk Model
Abstract
Pine resin is one of the demanded products to have proceeded into gondorukem. Gondorukem from Indonesia has a competitive advantage compared to other countries because it is stickier, heat resistant, and has a distinctive aroma so its exports are attractive to other countries. Ensuring the quality and quantity of gondorukem requires a smooth pine resin supply chain. This study aims to determine risk events and risk agents in the supply chain of pine resin that inhibit production, and design strategies to reduce the chance of emerging risks. House of Risk (HOR) is used to determine and apply the priority of risk agents and preventive actions. The study identified a total of 15 risk events and 30 risk agents that affect the quality and quantity of pine resin. Eighteen risk agents are prioritized, three of which are weather conditions, tapping personnel, and tree conditions for designing preventive actions. There are 3 priority preventive actions to handle the risk agent, namely (i) improving and controlling the quality of pine resin from the beginning process, (ii) giving a performance-based incentive and special tariff for a local tapper, and (iii) applying a resin tapping system with biogemme program.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Arsyad, W. O. M., Satiti, E. R., & Sukadaryati. (2019).Decisions Making Process In Organic Stimulant Innovation Adoptions Using Stakeholders Analysis. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 16(1), 1–10.
Corryanti, & Sugito. (2015). Lebih Dekat Tentang Sumber Benih Pinus Kebun benih Semai. In Seedling Seed Orchard. Cepu: Puslitbang Perum Perhutani Cepu.
Doan, A. N. G. (2007). Ciri-Ciri Fisik Pinus(Pinus merkusii Jungh et de Vriese) Banyak Menghasilkan Getah dan Pengaruh Pemberian Stimulansia Serta Kelas Umur Terhadap Produksi Getah Pinus Di RPH Sawangan dan RPH Kemiri, KPH Kedu Selatan Perum Perhutani Unit I Jawa Tengah. [Skripsi]. Bogor: IPB University. https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/48935.
Fachroji, A., Ujang, S., Endang, S., & Hariyanto. (2009). Perbandingan Daya Saing Produk Gondorukem di Pasar Internasional. Jurnal Manajemen dan Agribisnis, 6(2), 140–151.
Faiz. (2019). Focus Group Discussion (FGD): Pengembangan Pinus Bocor Getah Perum Perhutani. http://inhutani1.co.id/index. php/2019/10/21/focus-group-discussion-fgdpengembangan-pinus-bocor-getah-perumperhutani/.
Füller, T. N., de Lima, J. C., de Costa, F., RodriguesCorrêa, K. C. S., & Fett-Neto, A. G. (2016).Stimulant Paste Preparation and Bark Streak Tapping Technique for Pine Oleoresin Extraction. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), 1405, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-14939-3393-8_2.
Hidayat, J., & Hansen, C. (2001). Informasi singkat benih. In Indonesia Forest Seed Project (Vol. 12, Issue oktober). Jakarta: Direktorat Perbenihan. Tanaman Hutan.
Holiste. (2015). Biogemme is innovating the way pine resin is collected. Holiste Laboratoire et Developpement. https://www.holiste.com/en/ biogemme-is-innovating-the-way-pine-resin-iscollected/.
Hutabalian, Batubara, R., & Dalimunthe, A. (2016).Pengaruh Diameter dan Konsentrasi Stimulantsi Asam Cuka (C2H4O) Terhadap Produktivitas Getah Pinus (Pinus merkusii Jungh et de Vriese). Peronema Forestry. Science Journal, 4(2), 10–16.
Kuspradini, H., Rosamah, E., Sukaton, E., Arung, E. T., & Kusuma, I. W. (2016). Pengenalan Jenis Getah: Gum-Lateks-Resin. (Issue 4). Samarinda: Mulawarman University Press.
Lestari, L. (2012). Pengaruh Periode Pelukaan pada Penyadapan Getah Pinus dengan Metode Bor di Hutan Pendidikan Gunung Walat Kabupaten Sukabumi, Jawa Barat. [Skripsi]. (Vol. 66).Bogor: IPB University.
Mampi, B., Hapid, A., & Muthmainnah. (2018). Produksi Getah Pinus (Pinus merkusii Jung et de Vriese) Pada Berbagai Diameter Batang Menggunakan Sistem Koakan di Desa Namo Kecamatan Kulawi Kabupaten Sigi. Jurnal Warta Rimba, 6(3), 42–48. https://core.ac.uk/download/
pdf/11715904.pdf.
Millaty, S. D., Rahman, A., & Yuniarti, R. (2014). Analisis Risiko Pada Supply Chain Pembuatan Rokok Filter (Studi Kasus: PT. Filtrona Indonesia, Surabaya). Jurnal Rekayasa dan Manajemen
Sistem Industri, 2(1), 151–162.
Perhutani. (2014). Berikan Tarif Kompetitif Untuk Getah Pinus. Perhutani. http://perumperhutanidivrejanten.blogspot.com/2014/07/berikan-tarifkompetitif-untuk-getah.html.
Perhutani. (2016). Laporan Tahunan 2016: Mengubah Budaya Kerja Menguatkan Usaha. Jakarta: Perum Perhutani.
Perhutani. (2019). Laporan Tahunan (Annual Report) 2018. Jakarta: Perum perhutani.
Prihantoro, R. (2012). Konsep Pengendalian Mutu. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Pujawan, I. N., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of risk: A model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 953–967. https://doi. org/10.1108/14637150911003801.
Rahardian, R. S. (2020). Analisis Manajemen Risiko Proyek Pembangunan Suncity Apartement Residence Sidoarjo. [Tesis]. Surabaya:Untag http://repository.untag-sby.ac.id/id/eprint/6915.
Rahmawati, R., & Corryanti. (2015). Trobosan Memperbanyak Pinus. (Pinus merkusii). (2 ed.).
Cepu: Puslitbang Perum Perhutani Cepu. Sallata, M. kudeng. (2013). Pinus (Pinus merkusii Jungh Et De Vriese) dan Keberadaannya Di Kabupaten Tana Toraja, Sulawesi Selatan. Info Teknis Eboni, 10(2), 85–98.
Sanudin. (2009). Strategi Pengembangan Hutan Rakyat Pinus di Kabupaten Humbang Hasundutan, Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 6(2), 131–149.
Satil, F., Selvi, S., & Polat, R. (2013). Ethnic uses of pine resin production from Pinus brutia by native people on the Kazdag Mountain (Mt. Ida) in Western Turkey. Journal of Food, Agriculture &
Environment, 9(3), 1059-1063.
Septiani, W. (2016). Rancang bangun model manajemen risiko rantai pasok agroindustri susu berbasis pengetahuan.[Disertasi]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Sharma, K., & Lecha, C. (2013). Tapping of Pinus ruxburghii (Chir Pine) for oleoresin in Himachal Pradesh, India. Advances in Forestry Letters, 2(3), 53-61.
Sukadaryati, Santosa, G., Pari, G., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Hardjanto. (2014). Penggunaan Stimulan dalam Penyadapan Pinus. Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan, 32(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.20886/
jphh.v32i4.612.329-340.
Sukarno, A., Hardiyanto, E. B., Marsoem, S. N., & Na, M. (2012). Pengaruh Perbedaan Kelas Umur terhadap Produktivitas Getah Pinus merkusii Jungh et de Vriese Ras Lahan Jawa melalui Penyadapan Getah Metode Bor Effect of Among Age Class Differences On Oleoresin Production Pinus merkusii Jungh Et De Vriese Java Land Race. Pal, 3(1), 28–31.
Sutrisno, E. (2019). Budaya Organisasi. (5 ed.). Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Suwaji, S., Lamusa, A., & Howara, D. (2017). Analisis Pendapatan Petani Penyadap Getah Pinus Di Desa Tangkulowi Kecamatan Kulawi Kabupaten Sigi Sulawesi Tengah. E-J. Agrotekbis, 5(1),
–133.
Ulfah, M., & Syamsul, M. (2016). Analisis Dan Perbaikan Manajemen Risiko Rantai Pasok Gula Rafinasi dengan Pendekatan House of Risk. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 26(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.24961/jtip.26.%p.
Vermont. (2016). The Process of Maple Syrup From Sap To Syrup. Vermontmaple.Org. https://www.vermontvacation.com/landing-pages/promotions/campaigns/2016/spring/process
Wibowo. (2011). Manajemen Kinerja. (Edisi Keti). Depok:Rajagrafindo Persada.
Wiyono, B. (2010). Teknologi pengolahan gondorukem hidrogenesi dari hasil penyulingan getah pinus. Bogor: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Keteknikan Kehutanan dan Pengolahan Hasil Hutan.
Yusran, Y., Erniwati, & Sustri. (2018). Pembibitan Tusam (Pinus merkusii Jungh & de Vriese) Oleh Kelompok Tani Hutan di Lereng Pegunungan Gawalise Desa Uwemanje Kecamatan Kinovaro
Kabupaten Sigi, Sulawesi Tengah. Jurnal Bakti Saintek: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bidang Sains dan Teknologi, 2(1), 62–74.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2022.19.1.15-32
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
