THE ACCESS MECHANISM TO THE PROPERTY RIGHTS IN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT OF MERANTI, SOUTH SUMATRA

Ja Posman Napitu, Aceng Hidayat, Sambas Basuni, Sofyan Sjaf

Abstract


The interest of various parties on forest utilization access lead to the ambiguity of property rights due to user overlapping. This research explained the ambiguity factors of property rights from access mechanism and its relation to the land conflict. The research using purposive sampling method to obtain data of land use change, documents, historical study, as well as in-depth interviews of 123 people key informant. Rapid Land Tenure Assessment (RaTA) and descriptive analysis method were used to analyze the data. The results showed that both access and property rights theory could explain the overlapping use on forest area in Meranti Forest Management Unit (FMU). Analysis of rights-based access mechanism explained factors within the property rights status and the causes of land overlapping, i.e. the dynamics of management change, boundaries area issues, and lack of control. The factors of land user based on structure mechanism were the kinship ties, patroness system or pesirah, community and religious leaders. The access of structure mechanism have lead to claim of 38.53% areas of Meranti FMU. Changes of the rules have increased new users and causing overlapping between bussines license holder with community access. The research recommends avoiding change of area management forms, and for involving local communities in determining new users, duration, and profit sharing.

Keywords


Access; property rights; rights-based mechanism; structure mechanism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dhiaulhaq, A., Gritten, D., De Bruyn, T., Yasmi, Y., Zazali, A., & Silalahi, M. (2014). Transforming conflict in plantations through mediation: Lessons and experiences from Sumatera, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 41(2014), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.01.003

Dolšak, N., & Ostrom, E. (2003). The challenges of the commons. In Dolšak, N., & Ostrom, E. (Eds). The commons in the new millennium : Challenges and adaptation. Cambridge (Massachusetts): The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-2857-5

Febryano, I.G., Suharjito, D., Darusman, D., Kusmana,C., & Hidayat, A. (2015). Aktor dan relasi kekuasaan dalam pengelolaan mangrove di Kabupaten Pesawaran, Provinsi Lampung,Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 12(2), 123–138.

Fennell, L.A. (2011). Ostrom’ s law: Property rights in the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 5(1), 9–27.

Gamin, G., Kartodihardjo, H., Kolopaking, L.M.& Boer, R. (2014). Menyelesaikan konflik penguasaan kawasan hutan melalui pendekatan gaya sengketa para pihak di Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Lakitan. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 11(1), 71 - 90.

Galudra, G., Sirait, M., Pasya, G., Fay, C., Suyanto, van Noordwijk, M., & Pradhan, U. (2010). RaTA: rapid land tenure assessment manual for identifying the nature of land tenure conflicts. Bogor: World Agroforestry Centre.

Hendricks, W. (1991). How to manage conflict: A practical guide to effective conflict management. Shawnee Mission, Kansas: National Press Publications.

Hyde, W.F. (2016). Whereabouts devolution and collective forest management ? Forest Policy and Economics, 72, 85–91.

Ingram, J.C., Wilkie, D., Clements, T., McNab,R.B., Nelson, F., Baur, E.H........ Foley,C.A.H. (2014). Evidence of payments for ecosystem services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods. Ecosystem Services, 7, 10–21.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.003

Kant, S., Vertinsky, I., & Zheng, B. (2016). Valuation of first nations peoples's social , cultural , and land use activities using life satisfaction approach.Forest Policy and Economics, 72, 46–55.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.014

Karsudi, Soekmadi, R., & Kartodihardjo, H. (2010).Model pengembangan kelembagaan pembentukan wilayah Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan di Provinsi Papua. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tanaman, XVI(2), 92–100.

Kartodihardjo, H. (2007). Dibalik kerusakan hutan dan bencana alam. Masalah transformasi kebijakan kehutanan. Jakarta: KEHATI.

Kartodihardjo, H. (2013). Masalah cara pikir dan praktek kehutanan: Refleksi dan evaluasi II.In Kartodihardjo H (Ed.), Kembali ke jalan lurus: Kritik penggunaan ilmu dan praktek kehutanan. Bogor: Forci Development.

Larson, A., & Pulhin, J. (2012). Enhancing forest tenure reforms through more responsive regulations.Conservation and Society, 10(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.97482

Ministry of Forestry. (2008). Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in Indonesia. Bogor: FORDA.

Mulyaningrum, Kartodihardjo, H. Jaya, I.N.S., & Nurgroho, B. (2013). Stakeholders analysis of policy-making process: the case of timber legality policy on private forest. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, XIX(2), 156–162.

Mutolib, A., Yonariza, Mahdi, & Ismono, H. (2015). Konflik agraria dan pelepasan tanah ulayat (Studi kasus pada masyarakat suku melayu di Kesatuan Pemangkuan Hutan Dharmasraya,Sumatera Barat). Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 12(3), 213–225.

Nugroho, B. (2013). Reformasi kelembagaan dan tata kepemerintahan: Faktor pemungkin menuju tata kelola kehutanan yang baik. In Kartodihardjo, H. (Ed.). Kembali ke jalan lurus: Kritik penggunaan ilmu dan praktek kehutanan. Bogor: Forci Development..

Nurtjahjawilasa, Kartodihardjo, H., Nurrochmat, D.R., Justianto, A. (2015). Analisis pemangku kepentingan dalam kebijakan pengelolaan dan pengembangan sumber daya manusia kehutanan. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 12(3), 235–248.

Ostrom, E. (2003). How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803015003002

Pirard, R., Petit, H., & Baral, H. (2017). Local impacts of industrial tree plantations: An empirical analysis in Indonesia across plantation types. Land Use Policy, 60 (2017), 242–253.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.038

Priyatna, F.N. & Kinseng, R.A., & Satria, A. (2013). Akses dan strategi aktor-aktor dalam pemanfaatan sumber daya Waduk Djuanda. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 8(1), 1–9.

Quizon A.B. (2013). Land governance in Asia: Understanding the debates on land tenure rights and land reforms in the Asian context. Rome: International Land Coalition.

Ribot, J.C. & Peluso, N.L. (2003). A theory of access. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153–181.

Schlager, E. & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249–262.

Shivakoti, G. & Ostrom, E. (2007). Facilitating decentralized policies for sustainable governance and management of forest resources in Asia. In Webb, E.L. & Shivakoti, G. (Eds.), Decentralization, forests and rural communities. Policy outcomes in South and Southeast Asia. California: SEGA Publications.

Sinabutar, P., Nugroho, B., Kartodihardjo, H., & Darusman, D. (2015). Kepastian hukum dan pengakuan para pihak hasil pengukuhan kawasan hutan negara di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 12(1), 27–40.

Suharti, S., Darusman, D., Nugroho, B., & Sundawati, L. (2016). Kelembagaan dan perubahan hak akses masyarakat dalam pengelolaan hutan mangrove di Sinjai Timur, Sulawesi Selatan. Soladity: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, Agustus 20, 165–175.

Sylviani, & Hakim, I. (2014). Analisis tenurial dalam pengembangan Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH): Studi kasus KPH Gedong Wani, Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 11 (4), 309–322.

Tsujino, R., Yumoto, T., Kitamura, S., Djamaluddin, I. & Darnaedi, D. (2016). History of forest loss and degradation in Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 57(2016), 335–347.

Zhang, D. (2016). Payments for forest-based environmental services: A close look. Forest Policy and Economics, 72 (2016), 78–84.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2017.14.2.101-118

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Indexed by:

 ...More

Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan (JPSEK)
eISSN : 2502-4221 pISSN : 1979-6013
JPSEK is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.