Benefit, View, and Alternative of Social Forestry Program in Two Reference Groups, Pemalang Regency
Abstract
Social forestry program expected to give space for people in forest management, improve livelihood, and conserve the environment at once to decrease poverty rate on people who live around the forest. This article aims to describe the benefit of community member which is complemented by deepening of view and alternative of social forestry program in Kelompok Tani Hutan Gunung Gajah Lestari (KTH GGL) and Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan Rawa Sakti (LMDH RS). Qualitative approach in case study form is used which interview 49 informants include managements and members that accompanied by focus group discussion as data triangulation which processed by Nvivo application and Microsoft Excel. The result shows social forestry program has viewed giving benefit although it felt not optimal by the members in both groups. However, rough calculation on utilization of forest areas tends possibly to contribute around Rp.1,5-3 million rupiah/planting period. The utilization of forest areas is revival means or additional income where social-economic context is needed to be understood on identify commodity alternative that can be developed in the further time. The rest is the need for natural science approach which can answer the confusion of community to find alternatives commodity which more give revenue.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Asmin, F., Darusman, D., Ichwandi, I., & Suharjito,D. (2019). Mainstreaming community-based forest management in west sumatra: Social forestry arguments, support, and implementation. Forest and Society, 3(1), 77–96.https://doi.
org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.4047.
Checkland, P. (2000). Soft Systems Methodology : A Thirty Year Retrospective a. 58, 11–58.
CIFOR. (2007). Pengelolaan hutan bersama masyarakat (PHBM): Kolaborasi antara masyarakat desa hutan dengan Perum Perhutani dalam pengelolaan sumberdaya hutan di Jawa. In Uni Eropa, CIRAD, CIFOR, UGM, Perum
Perhutani. https://www2.cifor.org/lpf/docs/java/LPF_Flyer_PHBM.pdf.
Ekawati, S., Suharti, S., & Anwar, S. (2020). Bersama Membangun Perhutanan Sosial (S. Ekawati, S.Suharti, & S. Anwar (eds.); Cetakan 1,). Penerbit IPB Press.
Essougong, U. P. K., Foundjem-Tita, D., & Minang, P. A. (2019). Addressing equity in community forestry: Lessons from 20 years of implementation in cameroon. Ecology and Society, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10656-240109.
Firdaus, Y. A. (2018). Panduan Praktis Penerapan Kebijakan Perhutanan Sosial. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006856.
Fisher, M. R., Moeliono, M., Mulyana, A., Yuliani, E. L., Adriadi, A., Kamaluddin, Judda, J., & Sahide,
M. A. K. (2018). Assessing the New Social Forestry Project in Indonesia: Recognition, Livelihood and Conservation? International Forestry Review, 20(3), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818824063014.
FWI/GFW. (2001). Keadaan Hutan Indonesia. Forest
Watch Indonesia dan Global Forest Watch.
Hayati, N. (2021). Valuasi Ekonomi Taman Wisata Alam Lejja Kabupaten Soppeng Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 18(3), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2021.18.3.153-169.
Hendarto, K. A., Hasan, R. Al, Yumantoko, Nur, A., & Ariawan, K. (2019). The Economic Value Of Recreational Benefit of Aik Nyet Nature Tourism, KPH Rinjani Barat: An Application of the Travel Cost Methods. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 16(1), 43–54.https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2019.16.1.43-54.
Hidayat, D. C., Maryani, R., Irawanti, S., Susanto, M. L., & Witono, J. R. (2020). Analisis Finansial Pupuk Organik Cair Kelompok Tani Hutan Kemasyarakatan Harapan Maju di Desa Mobui Sebagai Upaya Pengembangan Usaha
Perhutanan Sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2020.17.1.1-12.
Hidayat, H. (2015). Pengelolaan Hutan Lestari: Partisipasi, Kolaborasi dan Konflik (H. Hidayat (ed.)). Yayasan Pustaka Obor.
Jariyah, N. A. (2019). Evaluasi Kinerja Sosial Ekonomi DAS Brantas Berdasarkan Penerapan P61/Menhut-II/2014. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 16(9), 95–114.
Kaskoyo, H., Mohammed, A. J., & Inoue, M. (2017). Impact of community forest program in protection forest on livelihood outcomes: A case study of Lampung Province, Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 36(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1296774.
Kelly, E. C. (2018). The Role of the Local Community on Federal Lands: the Weaverville Community Forest. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 15(40), 163–177. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/90023270.
KLHK. (2017a). Profil Kelompok KTH Gunung Gajah Lestari. KLHK. (2017b). Profile LMDH Rawa Sakti.
Kuncoro, M., & Cahyani, D. (2018). Performance of social forestry on farmers’ revenues: lessons
from Yogyakarta and Lampung, Indonesia. The Business & Management Review, 9(4), 275–289.
Lugina, M., Indartik, & Pribadi, M. A. (2019). Valuasi Ekonomi Ekosistem Mangrove dan Kontribusinyaterhadap Pendapatan Rumah Tangga. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Kehutanan, 16(3), 197–210.
Mehregan, M. J., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Kazemi, A. (2012). An application of Soft System Methodology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 426-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.051.
Moeliono, M., Thuy, P. T., Bong, I. W., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2017). Social forestrywhy and for whom?
A comparison of Policies in vietnam and Indonesia. Forest and Society, 1(2), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.2484.
Nath, T. K., Jashimuddin, M., & Inoue, M. (2016). Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) in Bangladesh. In World Forests (Vol. 22, Issue August 2018). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10549811.2016.1231615.Noveria, M., Mashudi, Gayatri, I. H., & Mulyani,
L. (2005). Hutan, Masyarakat dan Pasar: Usulan Perubahan Paradigma dan Reformasi Kebijakan Sumber Daya Hutan. LIPI Press. http://penerbit.lipi.go.id/penerbitan. cgi?daftar&1107298611&9951&&semua.
Nurrochmat, D. R., Massijaya, M. Y., Jaya, I. N. S., Abdulah, L., Ekayani, M., Astuti, E. W., & Erbaugh, J. T. (2019). Promoting community forestry to reduce deforestation surrounding Gunung Rinjani National Park in Central
Lombok, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 285(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/285/1/012014.
Pambudi, A. S. (2020). The Development of Social Forestry in Indonesia. The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 1(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v1i1.11.
Pujo, Sofhani, T. F., Gunawan, B., & Syamsudin, T. S. (2018). Community capacity building in social forestry development: A review. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 29(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.5614/jrcp.2018.29.2.3.
Quazi, S. a, Bushley, B. R., & Miles, W. B. (2008). Introduction: Participation and the collaborative management of protected areas in Bangladesh. In Connecting communities and conservation: Collaborative management of protected areas in Bangladesh. USA: United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (pp. 1–25).
https://www.eastwestcenter.org/sites/default/files/fileadmin/resources/publications/PDF/connectingcommunities02introduction.pdf.
Rachmawan, D. (2020). Focus Group Discussion dengan KLHK.
Rakatama, A., & Pandit, R. (2020). Reviewing social forestry schemes in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges. Forest Policy and Economics, 111(1), 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102052.
Royer, S. De, Noordwijk, M. Van, & Roshetko, J. M. (2018). Does community-based forest management in Indonesia devolve social justice or social costs? International Forestry Review, 20(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818823767609.
Santika, T., Wilson, K. A., Budiharta, S., Kusworo, A., Meijaard, E., Law, E. A., Friedman, R.,
Hutabarat, J. A., Indrawan, T. P., St. John, F. A. V., & Struebig, M. J. (2019). Heterogeneous impacts of community forestry on forest conservation and poverty alleviation: Evidence from Indonesia. People and Nature, 1(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.25.
Saputro, D., Supardi, S., & Marwanti, S. (2020). Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Pengusahaan Kayu Sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria) Dengan Pola Tanam Agroforestrydi Kabupaten Magetan. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 17(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2020.17.1.29-37.
Surati, S., Irawanti, S., Hidayat, D. C., Handoyo, H., Ariawan, K., Kurniawan, A. S., & Mulyadin, R. M. (2019). Analysis of Livelihoods in Peat Land: the Case of Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan
Ekonomi Kehutanan, 16(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2019.16.2.81-93
Susilo, A. (2011). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pedagang Kaki Lima Menempati Bahu Jalan Di Kota Bogor (Studi Kasus Pedagang Sembako di Jalan Dewi Sartika Utara). Tesis, Fakultas Ekonomi Program Magister Perencanaan dan Kebijakan Publik Jakarta Desember 2011, 1–92.
Susilo, Y. S., & Nairobi. (2019). Dampak Perhutanan Sosial Terhadap Pendapatan Masyarakat (The Impact of Social Forestry on Community Incomes). Jurnal ISEI Economic Review, III(1), 16–27.
Timko, J., & Webbe, J. R. (2020). Indigenous forest governance: challenges, enabling conditions and factors for success.
Weissberg, L. M., Kusel, J. P., & Rodger, K. A. (2018). From conflict to collaboration. Humboldt Journal of Social Relation, 40(40), 178–190. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/90023271.
Wright, G. D., Andersson, K. P., Gibson, C. C., & Evans, T. P. (2016). Decentralization can help reduce deforestation when user groups engage with local government. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(52), 14958–14963. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610650114.
Wulandari, C., & Kurniasih, H. (2019). Community preferences for social forestry facilitation programming in lampung, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 3(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.24259/ fs.v3i1.6026.
Yovani, N. (2013). Transfer Teknologi sebagai Konstruksi Sosial: Sebuah Tesis awal yang diperoleh dari Perusahaan Afiliasi Jepang dan Perusahaan Lokal Komponen Otomotif dengan menggunakan Soft Systems Methodology.
… Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2022.19.1.29-41
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Indexed by:
...More
Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan (JPSEK)
eISSN : 2502-4221 pISSN : 1979-6013
JPSEK is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
